Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
As long as humanity, or its descendants, survives. That's probably on the order of a few billion years, but I have no precise idea.
Nothing. We merely have an absolutely accurate theory, and we can use that to do things. I think FTL engines are at the top of the wishlist ATM.
Everything will be the same everything, just as it was after Einstein rewrote mechanics the first time around.
I dunno, ask a philosopher.
All other science is specialized and simplified physics. They are still all necessary, since it would be infeasible to do the physics for all the stuff that occupies the universe, but they should all, ultimately, be simplifications of physics.
To anyone. I am asking whether the questions are logically coherent. And there is no anthropocentrism in physics. The universe is far stranger than it makes out to be.
The problem of what is "real" is mostly a philosophical one, since you can't distinguish the Matrix from something that's more "real." The real article is indistinguishable in every way from a computer calculating what the real thing looks like.
The whole concept of "entities" is a shortcut, but it's still a very useful one. I'm asking whether your question means anything.
Because maths is a structure. It only tells you where starting points lead.
Nah. The clergy of the past did not have atom smashers.
That sounds alot like Buddhism.
