• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Yet Another Kennedy Assassination Conspiracy Theory Almost 60 Years too late, new book The Final Witness by Paul Landis

Should the "Missing Bullet" that was "found" in the Presidential Limo trigger a New Investigation

  • Absolutely, never too late to chase a lead

    Votes: 3 50.0%
  • Absolutely not, another wild goose chase

    Votes: 2 33.3%
  • Absolutely not, it won't bring Kennedy or Camelot back

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Others, and people who voted, post away!

    Votes: 1 16.7%

  • Total voters
    6

Mock Turtle

Oh my, did I say that!
Premium Member
Maybe he needed some book income in his old age?
Perhaps, but for someone trained like that one would presume he knew the importance of evidence, although the fact that Oswald was killed so easily seems to reflect on things being rather different then than now or even decades later. Just being rather sloppy. :oops:
 
Last edited:

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
Perhaps, but for someone trained like that one would presume he knew the importance of evidence, although the fact that Oswald was killed so easily seems to reflect on things being rather different then than now or even decades later. Just rather sloppy. :oops:
To me it looks like as if they put him in front of his killer, being very careful in exposing his chest.

Defendants are also justice witnesses so they need bodyguards.

I would have expected something like this...when a witness who needs to testify against the mob is escorted to the Courthouse.
Or a middle way, at least.

 
Last edited:

Mock Turtle

Oh my, did I say that!
Premium Member
To me it looks like as if they put him in front of his killer, being very careful in exposing his chest.

Defendant are also justice witnesses so they need bodyguards.

I would have expected something like this...when a witness who needs to testify against the mob is escorted to the Courthouse.
Or a middle way, at least.

Different times, but I presume it was the sheer magnitude of the crime that affected people then and as to being seen as to solving it so quickly.
 

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
Different times, but I presume it was the sheer magnitude of the crime that affected people then and as to being seen as to solving it so quickly.
This picture says it all.
Facial expressions. Some of them are not surprised at all.


merlin_159911220_dc1d8d60-372c-49ff-b980-df3cea08a9ca-articleLarge.jpg
 

Estro Felino

Believer in free will
Premium Member
A photo just captures an instant and expressions change so I wouldn't put much store in this.
That's true...but it doesn't look normal to me.
The cop should have been in front of him...not behind.
They were going out of the police station.
 

F1fan

Veteran Member
I am not saying the KGB are saints.
The exact opposite.
We all know the KGB and what they did.

It's sad that people think the CIA are a priori saints.
Who has said this? And what evidence is there they were involved in the death of JFK?

Strawman and rumors. See how you mingle with nonsesene?
 

F1fan

Veteran Member
Even the Chinese and Russians never had a leader or president who was assassinated in what appeared to be a conspiracy linked to the government and corporate mafia. Worse , the J.F.K assassination has never been properly investigated and all its culprits and conspirators nabbed even after half a century. This fact alone shows that the conspirators are larger than life entities.

More worse is the Kennedy curse, where members of the Kennedy family had mysterious deaths attributed to bad luck and timing.

Inspite of his political success, Ted Kennedy never ran for president citing danger and cowed by death threats to his life. His statement reveals a lot, "I know that I'm going to get my *** shot off one day, and I don't want to."

All this suggests a lot of successful criminal maneuvers and manipulations behind the scenes , covering of tracks, and clever duping of the public.
There has been numerous investigations, both official and independent. The one's that weave conspiracy theories have bad habits of not following the evidence. There's been no actual findings of second shooters, for example.
It only means that the perpetrators have successfully derailed the investigation with all sorts of distractions and false leads.
What evidence do you have?
 

Shadow Wolf

Certified People sTabber & Business Owner
It only means that the perpetrators have successfully derailed the investigation with all sorts of distractions and false leads.
Not necessarily. Afterall, Jack Ruby may have just been a hotheaded pimp who really was upset iver the President being killed. It's even possible he thought it his patriotic duty.
 

jbg

Active Member
My conviction is that JFK was taken out because he stood in the way of escalation of the Vietnam war, which would be profitable to the deep state entities.
The Vietnam War was not on many radars at that point, and Kennedy was against the war, in my opinion, only in the sepia-tone imaginations of people who idealize Camelot. I think he would have been better than Johnson at explaining the need for intervention.

I think what got Kennedy in trouble was more likely his womanizing, especially with an East German consul, naked, in the White House swimming pool. The even more likely explanation is straightforward; Leo Harvey Oswald killed Kennedy on his own. No amount of conspiracy theorizing can bring back the imagined days of Camelot, no more than Richard Harris and Elizabeth Taylor could in the Broadway production.
 

ajay0

Well-Known Member
The Vietnam War was not on many radars at that point, and Kennedy was against the war, in my opinion, only in the sepia-tone imaginations of people who idealize Camelot. I think he would have been better than Johnson at explaining the need for intervention.

Kennedy was a former naval officer and was familiar with the Korean war a decade back which lead to American defeat and the loss of 36000 American soldiers.

Kennedy had send military advisors and special forces to Vietnam to aid the south vietnamese army, but was wary of sending in armed troops, as he probably assessed the situation as leading to an another disaster similar to the Korean war with American defeat and heavy losses. (Even the casualties of the military advisors and special forces he sent was high. )


Kennedy was concerned at the advances being made by the communist Viet Cong, but did not want to become involved in a land war in Vietnam. He hoped that the military aid would be sufficient to strengthen the Saigon government and its armed forces against the Viet Cong.


I think what got Kennedy in trouble was more likely his womanizing, especially with an East German consul, naked, in the White House swimming pool. The even more likely explanation is straightforward; Leo Harvey Oswald killed Kennedy on his own. No amount of conspiracy theorizing can bring back the imagined days of Camelot, no more than Richard Harris and Elizabeth Taylor could in the Broadway product
He stood in the way of huge profits of the military-industrial complex by deciding against a war that could lead to similar disaster like the Korean war .

After his untimely death, his cautious policy was reversed and American troops were sent to Vietnam. The war ended in American defeat again as well as loss of 54000 American troops. However the military industrial complex made huge profits due to the huge budget allocations to it for a decade.

Even the camelot dudes were not rolling in money like this.
 
Top