sojourner
Annoyingly Progressive Since 2006
Yup. That's correct. And if you knew enough about the subject to actually have an "authentic understanding," your statement above wouldn't have been made with sarcasm.[sarcasm] Because poisoning her as a punishment for violating a bronze age, draconian law is totally a spiritual implication. [/sarcasm]
Also, attacking me for having what you perceive as a poor understanding... when I made it clear later on in the topic that I was actually interested in having an authentic understanding is a very, very bad way to convince me of anything other than you're an ***.
I'm not attacking you. I'm attacking your interpretation and your hermeneutic. The first is an ad hominem fallacy. The second is ... debate. I'm also making an observation of your apparent lack of knowledge on the subject, based upon your posts. An observation isn't an "attack." My advice: if you can't stand the heat of debate, probably best to stay out of that kitchen -- at least until you come to some semblance of understanding of the thing you're disparaging here.