Not in my experience (provided you use the more proper "evidence" rather than "proof").Isn't that true of most all religious beliefs?
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
Not in my experience (provided you use the more proper "evidence" rather than "proof").Isn't that true of most all religious beliefs?
Heh. Not to mention basing arguments on tearing down the opponent's position.Since atheists began treating it with evangelical and religious fervour and piety, and based their thinking on a belief that is insupportable (ie. "God does not exist").
"that is insupportable (ie. "God does not exist").
God does not exist is not insupportable, god does exist is.
Then support it.God does not exist is not insupportable,
No moreso than the alternative.god does exist is.
Both positions have support. Neither has proof.God does not exist is not insupportable, god does exist is.
Oy vey. Ok, I am getting rather bored with your trifles. Let's say you just ignore the other posters for a bit and simply outline you esteemed opinions, m'kay.
*lobs the football to Rioku*
"Run, Frodo! RUN!"
So, you are one who accepts things as true or real without "proof"?
It will be fun watching you try to substantiate that. Pedantry should be made of sturdier stuff ... :yes:... there is an equal chance for an infinite amount of other events, gods and unimaginable things to exist.
Why can't you allow for God to be misquoted? Any message He may have given humanity has been filtered through imperfect humans?
It strikes me as odd when atheists take a more literal, fundamentalist stance on the scriptures of a religion than that of even its most extreme believers.
In any case, there are plenty of religious beliefs that don't fit the Abrahamic model of an omnipotent/omniscient/omnibenevolent single god. Plenty of religions believe in gods that are either not omnipotent and/or omniscient, or are not always perfectly benevolent.
You may be able to make a case against "every-word-in-the-Bible-is-literally-true" fundamentalist Christianity; the problem is that this doesn't describe the beliefs of most religious people... heck, it doesn't even describe the beliefs of most Christians.
It will be fun watching you try to substantiate that. Pedantry should be made of sturdier stuff ... :yes:
Oh, I see - sort of like the theist understands God. You're really not too good at this, Rioku ... :no:I agree with you it would be funny, because you either understand it or you don't.
Oh, I see - sort of like the theist understands God. You're really not too good at this, Rioku ... :no:
One wonders how one would calculate the chance of a God existing...combined chance that any of them exist is still infinitely small.
One might even call it over-ripe ... :yes:At this point the original mission of this thread is complete in a sense, ...
...or how about just "I don't know if God exists"?Annoyingly I and apologetically I respond to this. You are trying to say that because I say there is no god then I take things as true without evidence. Now given my statement that god does not exist then I can see why you would think that. So for you I will give an explanation. I do accept that there is a chance a god exists. ( I will not get into explaining the semantics of what I mean by god in this context). However there is an equal chance for an infinite amount of other events, gods and unimaginable things to exist. Also, if you take all concepts of god for every religion, and every personal belief of god, hence there can be over 7 billion ideas of god, the combined chance that any of them exist is still infinitely small. So rather then explaining that in every statement I just say God does not exist. In the future I will try and say something like the chance of god existing is insignificant.
But I do have to admit you have a skill of adding nothing useful to the topic and getting me to waist my time explaining it to you.