What on Earth are you trying to say? The scientific method may never come up with the correct answers but:
1. It's the best guess we've got. At least it bases it's hypotheses on tested evidence, reasoning, and logic, and takes the best logical positions it can come up with. It's produced by way of making the best and most progressive guesses it can, based on evidence. This is as opposed to religion, which involves taking answers just because they are said to be correct; if I write up random explanations for the universe's laws, does that mean they should be accepted, just because I say they are definitely true, whereas science admits to constantly improving? Religion works with assertions that science has long since left behind in the dust as far as probability is concerned.
2. Just look at the benefit of science in our modern world, as opposed to religion. Which world-view do you think has caused the production of such great feats, in the fields of technology and engineering most eminently, but also in all other fields of academic progress? The one which is willing to constantly be changed in order to match new logical thought, or the one which will always insist it is correct?