• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

young earthers

tumbleweed41

Resident Liberal Hippie
DNA, strictly speaking, is not code or language in the colloquial sense. While these words are used frequently when discussing DNA, it in no way implies the same meaning as when discussing traditional codes and/or language.
 

David M

Well-Known Member
“a rule for converting a piece of information, for example, a letter, word, phrase, or gesture, into another form or representation, like one sign into another sign, not necessarily of the same type”,

Which excludes DNA from being a code.
 

Looncall

Well-Known Member
I have positive proof of an intelligent designer, (a creator) But first I want you to answer the question below.

Do you know of any code, as defined by “a rule for converting a piece of information, for example, a letter, word, phrase, or gesture, into another form or representation, like one sign into another sign, not necessarily of the same type”, that came about naturally without an intelligent designer?

Oh Boy! Oh Boy! Positive proof! I can hardly wait! Let's see it!

How about foregoing the usual dishonest creationist word-game preamble and getting right to the point?
 

outhouse

Atheistically
Oh Boy! Oh Boy! Positive proof! I can hardly wait! Let's see it!

How about foregoing the usual dishonest creationist word-game preamble and getting right to the point?


thay cannot get right to the point.

without setting up reality through there eyes there point cannot be made with common sense.
 
Top