Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I do know that Baby Krishna and Bal Radharani is born in every house and shelter of every resident of Vrindavan on Janmashtami, even if they do not see both children in their house , Who are likely asking for (or stealing) ghee!
I do not recall seeing this Bal Radharani in Vrindavan -
I pray to Radharani's pet deer to save me from not thinking of Radha thinking of Krsna! If I imagine Radha thinking of Krsna by way of the mercy of Her pet Deer, then I might return to Vrindavan and find this Bal Radharani Murti with my eyes!
I heard Srimati Radha Rani was elder to Lord Krishna.
History and faith are two different things. Why blame the British for everything. Did not Chaitanya Mahaprabhu sing the praises of Srimati Radharani in 14th Century. Perhaps Neela Devi is the same as Srimati Radharani.It is most likely injected in one of the puranas, Brahma-vaivarta which is heavily touched by the british stooges to degrade sanatana dharma by making Sri Krushna look like an addict of some kind.
Hope this helps
Radha/Radharani is a fictious character....Radha was never ONCE mentioned in the bhagawatham. It is most likely injected in one of the puranas , Brahma-vaivarta which is heavily touched by the british stooges to degrade sanatana dharma by making Sri Krushna look like an addict of some kind.
Agree Ratikala,
If it has done good as you said by bringing many people into loving Krushna more, its good. But the fact is Radharani mainly was a fictious character, I cannot comment on the works of chaitanya mahaprabhu having never heard of him till now. Sri Krushna has that intense love what you are depicting for Neela devi/Nappinnai in his Krushna janma as one of the 12 alwars , our mother Goda Devi sings and explains in Tiruppavai about the beauty of Neela devi. According to Vedas, nArayaNa has 3 forms of Lakshmi devi as his wives in Sri Vaikuntam , Sri, Bhu, Neela. Neela devi is mentioned in Vedas while Radha not even once.
Some of the british stooges has equally corrupted the Adi Shankaracharya history in ways one cannot imagine, the real Shankaracharya in his authentic commentaries ,used only 3 words for the supreme brahman, that is Vishnu, Vasudeva and nArayaNa, he never sang about other deities, the 2 laharis shivananda and soundarya laharis are dropped on the real shankaracharya by another one with same name and imposed on him , the real adi shankara was born around 500 BC but the date was pushed to 800 AD so that english stooges can copy his philosophical works, would not go into that as that is another big explanation
Radha i think means attraction, love personified, in sanskrit , not sure of exact meaning, we can view her as the that may be.