• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Your description of "God" in 10 words or less

Aupmanyav

Be your own guru
Ben, when we understand 'what', we find that there is no 'who'. All this is a farce, of course, for a good reason; but when we forget the reason 'why', we end up in darkness.
 

Ben Dhyan

Veteran Member
Ben, when we understand 'what', we find that there is no 'who'. All this is a farce, of course, for a good reason; but when we forget the reason 'why', we end up in darkness.

So very profound Aupmanyav!.... but it required considerable contemplation on my part to understand the 'language' you use.

My understanding is that your post is actually conveying, and is consistent with, the universal theme, though in a way that at first glance it seems to be 'atheistic'.
 

Aupmanyav

Be your own guru
In easier language: I am an atheist, but I have no problem with believers if the idea of God propels them to be socially useful persons which was actually the reason for the idea of God. As for myself, I understand that there is no God. The universe is a play of energy (energy like in physics, light, electricity, heat, magnetism, gravity) and we are temporary forms of that energy. No esoterics like rebirth, heaven, hell, judgement, nirvana, universal conscience, etc.
 

Ben Dhyan

Veteran Member
In easier language: I am an atheist, but I have no problem with believers if the idea of God propels them to be socially useful persons which was actually the reason for the idea of God. As for myself, I understand that there is no God. The universe is a play of energy (energy like in physics, light, electricity, heat, magnetism, gravity) and we are temporary forms of that energy. No esoterics like rebirth, heaven, hell, judgement, nirvana, universal conscience, etc.

Don't want to seem obtuse, but it would help to understand if you were to explain your understanding of the concept 'atheist'.

And it would likewise help if you were to explain your understanding of the concept 'god' that you understand does not exist.

It seems to me that it is possible that we may agree that certain concepts of 'god' are ridiculous and yet have become a part of a contrived popular/cultural belief system to exploit the ignorant. But some light needs to shone on your concept of 'god' that doesn't exist to clarify matters.
 

Aupmanyav

Be your own guru
I (sort of) hate the word God, take both the explanations, run-of-the-mill and more esoteric, where God is impersonal, where everything is God, as wrong. God is one who can interfere in human affairs, judge your actions, has human attributes, loving, kind, feroceous to the non-believers or who would want to turn them into believers. God is one to whom you can pray and he can grant boons, etc. Atheist is one who does not believe in all this (s***) and the existence of anything like soul. I hope I have been able to make my meaning clear (Sometimes I would falter because of English not being my native language).

As for the multitude of hindu Gods and Goddesses, I take them as mythology (and a little of history and sociology), heroes and heroines, in whose stories we find the correct was of leading a life for us. In some stories, the actions of these heroes and heroines is examplary sometimes it falls short of what is accepted in our society (then we say they should not have acted in that way). But in both cases, the stories are meaningful to us.
 

Ben Dhyan

Veteran Member
I can understand your feeling and position concerning your understanding of the concept 'God', ie. both the 'run-of-the-mill' and the more 'esoteric'. However there is another understanding that perhaps you haven't considered, and that is that 'concepts' themselves are not real (except as concepts) and so it is not possible for the mortal mind which functions through conceptual thinking processes, to truly 'know' anything real beyond the mundane world.

For example, using my conceptual mind, I can postulate the existence of God, or again postulate there is no God. However it is my understanding that any concepts of 'no-God' or of 'God' that I create or believe in, are not really 'not-God' or 'God' but remain just concepts that represent that for which they stand.

Once it is understood that the truth behind reality can't be known by the mortal mind by mere mental representations (concepts), to continue to speculate in this area is vanity. To even complicate matters further, a word that has one conceptual meaning to one person, the very same word may be conceived as meaning something quite different by another. The mortal mind is a extraordinary faculty for dealing with the mundane world of space/time/matter/energy, but like all tools, it can be worse than useless in engaging it in areas for which it was not designed. There is much mankind is unaware of, and even unaware that they are unaware.

The question about the bigger picture remains though, and just because the mortal mind is incapable of knowing, that is no reason to conclude that there isn't more to it.
 

Little Joe Gould

Seeking God
As the anonymous author of "The Cloud" puts it (I believe) "The blind stirring of love". So I guess I'm agreeing with the majority.
 

Aupmanyav

Be your own guru
Brahman is manifest in all things (Sarve Khalu Idam - living or non-living) equally. It is our ego which makes us say that it is most manifest in humans.
 

ranjana

Active Member
human existence is like a conduit for the awareness of the divine, in all its manifestation. we are the marriage of dust and divinity, and who other but human beings can know it?
 

zenzero

Its only a Label
Friends,

In the beginning there was neither existence nor non-existance.
There was no atmosphere, no sky and no realm beyond the sky
What power was there? Where was that power?
Who was that power? Was it finite or infinite?

There was neither death nor immortality.
There was nothing to distinguish night from day.
There was no wind or breath, god alone breathed by his own energy.

In the beginning darkness was swathed in darkness, god was clothed in emptiness

Like mentioned in the above verse would state that:

God is EMPTINESS or NOTHINGNESS.

Love & rgds
 

Ben Dhyan

Veteran Member
Well, think over it- Who's Allah and Tuhan?;) (Hint- The word starts with G :D)

Thank you, one should have added "Nirvana" and "Tao", as these terms also represent the same underlying transcendent oneness as "Brahman", but conceptually are not thought of as "God".

In the Zen and Taoist tradition for example, conceptual beliefs are considered an impediment to the realization of the real, ie. that the traditional "God" conceptual understanding is a form of mental idolatry that both obscures, and is far from the indescribable "Way".

Meditation as a true religious practice is not a belief, but divine art.

Perhaps the object of each devotees search for "God" is within them, how ironic would that be!:)
 
Top