• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Your Reason for "God does not Exist".

chinu

chinu
SOME belive : God Exist
SOME belive : God does not Exist

There are different reasons for different peoples for their "BELIVES"

This Thread is only for those members who belive that "God does not Exist"

Please write one of your most attractive REASON which makes you belive that "GOD does not Exist".

Let there be a collection of different REASONS by different members in this Thread who belive that "GOD does not Exist"



_/\_Chinu.


KINDLY NOTE: Parllely there is also one more Thread started for those members who belive that: "GOD Exist", if your REASON does not favour to this thread you can post your REASON in this Thread.
Link:http://www.religiousforums.com/foru...108613-your-reason-god-exist.html#post2282688
 
Last edited:

bobhikes

Nondetermined
Premium Member
I took the time, reviewed several different religions, reviewed several scientific theories, reviewed philosphies, reviewed societies of the past, looked within myself, and put it all together in a proof for myself.

Its is my proof based on a lot of my life you could not understand it as a whole and would not agree with me but it is valid as is everyone else's.
 

9-10ths_Penguin

1/10 Subway Stalinist
Premium Member
My biggest reason: my mental model of how things work does not include any god, yet it seems to agree quite well with what I observe.

My second-biggest reason:
- people of all sorts of faiths include all sorts of gods in their own mental models, and from what I can gather, they all agree quite well with what they observe as well.
- however, if an input factor (in this case, gods) makes no difference at all in the accuracy of a model, then it can be dismissed as unnecessary.

IOW, I see the fact that most people, regardless of faith, can function equally well in the world speaks against the truth of what any one of them says they believe.
 

Magic Man

Reaper of Conversation
I'm just assuming we're going with a theistic god here.

There is no objective evidence that such a being exists. There is a lot of evidence that the gods described by various religions don't exist. We can see that god-concepts have changed as our understanding of the universe has changed.
 

Penumbra

Veteran Member
Premium Member
There's no evidence for one. There isn't even a common definition for one.

-Religious creation myths have been debunked.
-Prayer has been shown to have no statistical effect.
-Evolution by natural selection explains how humans have developed from simple life.
-The universe is dangerous, violent, chaotic, neutral, and uncaring.
-Nature causes grievous suffering.
-Consciousness, morality, thought, and personality have been demonstrated to be emergent properties of the physical brain.
-Religious people cannot support their claims with evidence.
 

jmvizanko

Uber Tool
Please write one of your most attractive REASON which makes you belive that "GOD does not Exist".

If there is one, why isn't he helping us with all our problems? For instance, giving us a cure for terribly excruciating diseases that inflicts even children?
 
Last edited:

chinu

chinu
I took the time, reviewed several different religions, reviewed several scientific theories, reviewed philosphies, reviewed societies of the past, looked within myself, and put it all together in a proof for myself.

Its is my proof based on a lot of my life you could not understand it as a whole and would not agree with me but it is valid as is everyone else's.

Similarly: I took the time, reviewed several different religions, reviewed several scientific theories, reviewed philosphies, reviewed societies of the past, looked within myself, and put it all together in a proof for myself.
Its is my proof based on a lot of my life you could not understand it as a whole and would not agree with me but it is valid as is everyone else's.

But: Why the Result is Opposite.

_/\_Chinu.
 

chinu

chinu
My biggest reason: my mental model of how things work does not include any god, yet it seems to agree quite well with what I observe.
Take some milk, some coffee beans, some suger, some cream, and a coffee making machine.
Can a cup of coffee be prepared itself by just collecting the metrial, No!, Why ?
Because this needs our Concentration to prepare a cup of coffee, What is this Concentration ?
This Concentration is itself God, and this is how the God works everywhere.

My second-biggest reason:
- people of all sorts of faiths include all sorts of gods in their own mental models, and from what I can gather, they all agree quite well with what they observe as well.
- however, if an input factor (in this case, gods) makes no difference at all in the accuracy of a model, then it can be dismissed as unnecessary.
IOW, I see the fact that most people, regardless of faith, can function equally well in the world speaks against the truth of what any one of them says they believe.

How do you relate this with your belive, Nonexistance of God ?


_/\_Chinu.
 

chinu

chinu
-Religious creation myths have been debunked.
Can a dead docter treat the patient, so why to go with myths.
Why not people serch for the living docter, but beware serch for the docter not barber, otherwise your_____ will be cuted,
Don't go with the dress or any showoff, just see the art working inside.

-Prayer has been shown to have no statistical effect.
When all statistical effects stop its work, then only prayer starts its effect.
Truely this is the name of True Prayer.

-Evolution by natural selection explains how humans have developed from simple life.
& how easily nature can destroy in seconds.

-The universe is dangerous, violent, chaotic, neutral, and uncaring.
Only for those who chellange.

-Nature causes grievous suffering.
Due to some unnaturel activities done by Man.

-Consciousness, morality, thought, and personality have been demonstrated to be emergent properties of the physical brain.
As declared by some scientists docters

-Religious people cannot support their claims with evidence.
Is it possible to tell the taste of apple without giving the example of apple,
Similarly There is God.
Those who taste it, know it.



_/\_Chinu.
 

chinu

chinu
If there is one, why isn't he helping us with all our problems? For instance, giving us a cure for terribly excruciating diseases that inflicts even children?

Like a child who is crying & shouting a lot when brought to the docter for treatment by his mother to cure the disease, But he is unknown that's why he is shouting & does't know the "Love" of his mother.

Similarly:

Soul(child) cryies & shout a lot when brought to the DOCTER (three docters: Poorness, sickness & dishonour) for treatment by God (mother) to cure the Diseases (five diseases: Lust, Anger, Greed, False attachments & Vanity ), But Soul (he) is unknown that's why Soul (he) is shouting & does't know the "Love" of God (mother).


_/\_Chinu.
 

9-10ths_Penguin

1/10 Subway Stalinist
Premium Member
Take some milk, some coffee beans, some suger, some cream, and a coffee making machine.
Can a cup of coffee be prepared itself by just collecting the metrial, No!, Why ?
Because this needs our Concentration to prepare a cup of coffee, What is this Concentration ?
This Concentration is itself God, and this is how the God works everywhere.
I don't think that "concentration", by itself, meets any valid definition of "God".

If you're saying that my concentration is a manifestation of some larger force, entity, person, or what-have-you, and that this larger thing is God, then that a claim that needs to be justified on its own merits, and I've seen no reason to assume that it's true.

How do you relate this with your belive, Nonexistance of God ?
If it works just as well to live assuming that God exists as it does to live assuming that God doesn't exist at all, then God is completely irrelevant. Non-existence is a very good explanation for complete irrelevancy.

Whatever one's belief in God, there are many people in the world who believe something completely different and operate on that basis. Normally, if we live believing that something is true when it's actually false, we will have major problems when those false beliefs are confronted by reality.

Now, it's possible that we have false beliefs that are never challenged, but this only happens if the true facts of the matter never impact on our lives.

So what should we make of theistic belief, then? Atheists and theists of all stripes seem to get along just fine regardless of what they believe about God. IOW, God-belief is irrelevant to how well a person's conceptualization of the world agrees with what they see.

Maybe this means that God doesn't really exist. Maybe it means that God exists, but doesn't impact the world.

... but either way, this causes major problems for most forms of theism, because it excludes the idea of a God who interacts with humanity. The idea that God is irrelevant directly contradicts the claims of religions that preach that God is the most relevant thing in existence.

This suggests to me that all forms of theism I've ever encountered are wrong, with the possible exception of deism (though I think that deism has its own problems).

At the very least, the idea that God does not interact with humanity suggests that none of the god-claims of any religion came from a position of actual knowledge, since without having access to a God on which to base them, they lose their justification.
 
Top