And there we have it! The brilliant, conclusive rejoinder: "yea whatever".Yea whatever.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
And there we have it! The brilliant, conclusive rejoinder: "yea whatever".Yea whatever.
I am actually feeling a bit embarrass about all the crap that you and I have been going on with, so someone has to end it, and seeing that I am the mature one it will have to be me, he he.And there we have it! The brilliant, conclusive rejoinder: "yea whatever".
Instead of pretending to take the high road, you could just admit to being childish to begin with (especially as my first post here was closer to your opinion than any other that you responded to) given that you first responded to me with:I am actually feeling a bit embarrass about all the crap that you and I have been going on with, so someone has to end it, and seeing that I am the mature one it will have to be me, he he.
Just because you don't have any understand of what is been said here, doesn't mean anything to anyone, if you don't have anything that is worth while then why the hell are you here, what have you to offer that has already been shared here, come on give it to me.
I can tell.I am so mature like wat.
Yet, according to you, neither side can say anything about the other (thereby making them anything but of "the same coin").but both are of the same coin.
Funny that I was thinking the same about you, after all you were the first to make a comment that had nothing to do with anything here, you are very childish and all you want to do is win you little battle, if it means that much to you, then HEY!!, you win, good on ya, your so smart.Instead of pretending to take the high road, you could just admit to being childish to begin with (especially as my first post here was closer to your opinion than any other that you responded to) given that you first responded to me with:
Very mature.
Go away, dreamer.Yet, according to you, neither side can say anything about the other (thereby making them anything but of "the same coin").
But I, being poor, have only my dreamsGo away, dreamer.
Wow, your a poet to, you are a clever one.But I, being poor, have only my dreams
I have spread my dreams under your feet
Tread softly because you tread on my dreams
Dho, I know that, I was just being a smart ***, it seems the only language he knows.He literally attributed the poem to the author.
I thought his name was William Butler Y.He literally attributed the poem to the author.
I and other friends knew him as "Bill". My sister knew him as "Willy".I thought his name was William Butler Y.
LegionOnomaMoi said: ↑
Yet, according to you, neither side can say anything about the other (thereby making them anything but of "the same coin").
Go away, dreamer.
He literally attributed the poem to the author.
Then there is no evidence, right?I explained it...the other side is not conceptual...you want a conceptual explanation of the non-conceptual...see the problem?
Then there is no evidence, right?