Science and religion are different things with different roles and I think comparing them is misplaced. It's like asking if garlic is better than bananas or something.
I see it quite differently.
Science has objective standards and religion does not.
To me, it's more like asking "Is broccoli good?".
Broccoli is a healthy food. That's an objective standard. It's got lots of vitamins and fiber, no sugar or salt. The objective, scientific answer is "Yes". But lots of people think it tastes bad. That's a subjective opinion, some of us don't think it tastes bad. Some of us prefer it to chocolate. That's more like a religious answer.
Completely subjective, but it's very true for individuals. It's objectively true that an individual despises broccoli.
To me, that's the difference between science and religion. Science is objectively true, true for everyone. Religion is subjectively true, as per the individual, and only true for that one individual.
Tom