Yes, there is a huge difference, thank goodness. In Hinduism, many teachers insist you have to figure it out on your own, and of course, moksa is caused by merger of the individual (atman) with Brahman, so it is individual. Our worst scripture, by far, is the laws of Manu. While almost totally discarded now, it's the one that critics bring up, because it does contain lots of weird outdated stuff. Out scriptural library is massive, and it wouldn't take that long to find stuff that was archaic, scientifically, or otherwise. But we're an evolving faith, and certainly there is no infallibility. We also generally have some sensible explanations for some of the stuff as well. As I repeated to one Baha'i many times in the now 3 year old long discussion you and I were part of ... "Very different paradigms" I am encouraged others have taken up the role of offering the dharmic viewpoint of standing up to injustice even most here wouldn't realize that.
Personally, I value behavior over belief by about 20 times. I'm fine with beliefs I consider adharmic, just as long as people don't act on it. But as the old saying goes, actions speak louder than words.