Trailblazer
Veteran Member
I will certainly give you that!The story just does not work when read literally.
Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.
Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!
I will certainly give you that!The story just does not work when read literally.
You can say THAT again!It's evident that the whole text of the Bible can and does
mean anything the reader wants it to mean.
but if it was indeed a myth then only a mythical god would be at fault, not the real God.And if Adam was "perfect" he would never have been tricked. I do not see how creationists that believe that myth cannot see that no matter what God was at fault in the Adam and Eve myth.
I know. It is a self refuting religious belief. I often try to point out that the fact that life is the product of evolution does not refute the existence of a God. It only refutes bad versions of God. One can be almost any religion as long as one understands that holy books quite often use fables and allegories. Those still "work" in a religion as a teaching toolbut if it was indeed a myth then only a mythical god would be at fault, not the real God.
He is published.YouTube videos are not "evidence'. Real archaeological evidence is not found there. Archaeology is a scientific discipline too. If they have evidence they would have published in a well respected professional journal.
What would have been the outcome, if Adam hadn’t eaten the fruit, ie., disobeyed the command not to eat from that tree? (And yes, as I showed you a few months back, it was a command — see below.)But nowhere does it say Adam was created "perfect" and indeed he was expressly made imperfect since (as the text makes clear) he was denied knowledge of good and evil.
I never said immortal, and neither does the text imply that.And again I point out that the text nowhere says Adam was created immortal, any more than it says the creatures of sea, air and land were created immortal.
Because they disobeyed.I return yet again to the key passage of the Garden story, the specific and sole reason that Adam and Eve were chucked out ─ Genesis 3:22-23.
Do you realize, by saying the Edenic account is myth, then there’s really no reason for Jesus to die? It has no value, if his sacrifice wasn’t “redemptive”, ie., had nothing to redeem.You can say THAT again!
and it means some pretty silly things to some people.
Please, how do you come to that conclusion?It was never God’s purpose for mankind to have Endless life on Earth
Which normal human life span are you referring to?It is and has always been God's purpose for humans to live a normal human life span on Earth and then die and continue to live forever in Heaven.
Psalm 139:14 says:Had it been God's purpose for mankind to have Endless life on Earth, God would have created us with immortal bodies, not with mortal bodies
Of course, but the laws of the OT were for when Hebrews were not slaves, but slave owners,Not when they were slaves! Lol.
The Bible Hebrews by their laws owned, bought and sold slavesThen, you say, “The Hebrews…. owned slaves.”
Not while they themselves were slaves!!
That was the context under discussion.
Prove it. Show the references.
Where? And if he is why didn't you link it? And even more important, what do other scholars have to say about him.He is published.
No, the Garden of Eden myth tried to explain why man is not perfect. Myth or not man is not perfect. One can still argue that redemption is needed.Do you realize, by saying the Edenic account is myth, then there’s really no reason for Jesus to die? It has no value, if his sacrifice wasn’t “redemptive”, ie., had nothing to redeem.
What would have been the outcome, if Adam hadn’t eaten the fruit, ie., disobeyed the command not to eat from that tree? (And yes, as I showed you a few months back, it was a command — see below.)
He would never have died!
You can’t see that?
I never said immortal, and neither does the text imply that.
Having endless life, does not mean having immortality.
Once again, a command is meaningless if a person does not know right from wrong.Angels have endless life, but they are not immortal. In fact, many of them — Satan and the demons [ = ‘the dragon and his angels’ - Rev.12:9] — will be destroyed.
Because they disobeyed.
Genesis 3:17…
“And to Adam he said: “Because you listened to your wife’s voice and ate from the tree concerning which I gave you this command, ‘You must not eat from it,’….
And vss 22 & 23….
“Jehovah God then said: “Here the man has become like one of us in knowing good and bad. Now in order that he may not put his hand out and take fruit also from the tree of life and eat and live forever,—” 23 With that Jehovah God expelled him from the garden of Eʹden to cultivate the ground from which he had been taken.
It was so that Adam wouldn’t eat of the Tree of Life…. It had nothing to do with the Tree of Knowledge, anymore.
They’d already done that.
The result of eating, was, that they felt shame in their being naked.
Shame was not a feeling they’d ever had before, as perfect humans.
Good night.
No, I do not realize that and it is illogical because you are saying there could have been no other reason for Jesus to die.Do you realize, by saying the Edenic account is myth, then there’s really no reason for Jesus to die? It has no value, if his sacrifice wasn’t “redemptive”, ie., had nothing to redeem.
Show me where the Bible says that if Adam hadn’t eaten the fruit Adam would not have died.What would have been the outcome, if Adam hadn’t eaten the fruit, ie., disobeyed the command not to eat from that tree? (And yes, as I showed you a few months back, it was a command — see below.)
He would never have died!
You can’t see that?
How do you come to that conclusion that God’s purpose for mankind was to have Endless life on Earth?Please, how do you come to that conclusion?
No, that is not how I read it.I believe the Bible teaches, regarding Adam and Eve, that they had an opportunity to live forever on earth. God never said that they would die, unless they eat from the fruit of the tree in the middle of the garden.
Isn’t that how you read it?
I know that is a doctrine of your church but it is not supported by the Bible.Revelation 21:3,4 shows
3) … “ Look! The tent of God is with mankind, and he will reside with them, and they will be his people. And God himself will be with them.
4) And he will wipe out every tear from their eyes, and death will be no more. The former things have passed away.
These verses show that God is with mankind. Individuals have an opportunity to live forever on earth if they choose to do so.
I am referring to a normal human life span of 80 years. No human ever lived for 900 years.Which normal human life span are you referring to?
Are you referring to the human life span of about 900 years prior to the flood or 80 years in our timeline?
Please, why would God put them on earth, just to die later and go to heaven?
Where did you get these ideas? We die because the human body is mortal, it has nothing to do with sin.Psalm 139:14 says:
I praise you because in an awe-inspiring way I am wonderfully made. Your works are wonderful, I know this very well.
Mortal bodies continuously replace old cells with new ones.
We die, due to sin, which we inherited from Adam/Eve - genetically inherited ( not any other way )
Romans 5:12
That is why, just as through one man sin entered into the world and death through sin, and so death spread to all men because they had all sinned-.
Only if you insist that the Creative Days were literally 24-hr days. But this is actually evidence that they were not literal. (I wrote these things to blü2.)A&E did not die physically on the day they ate the fruit so is God a liar? No, God was truthful because A&E died spiritually on that day.
Did Adam and Eve die when they ate the forbidden fruit?Their physical condition changed as a result of their eating the forbidden fruit. As God had promised, they became mortal. They and their children would experience sickness, pain, and physical death. Because of their transgression, Adam and Eve *also* suffered spiritual death.Chapter 6: The Fall of Adam and Eve
To put it mildly, God screwed the pooch in the tale. He made Adam without knowledge of good and evil. That was the tree that they ate from afterwards they were "Oh ****" and hid from God. Which only works until God remembers to turn his omniscience back on.
God made Adam with a serious lack. He put a tree that fixed that, but also banned them from eating from it. The problem is that what they did not have was the ability to understand what was right or not. Then God also created "the serpent". And for some reason that critter wanted to roil up some trouble so he persuaded Eve to eat from the Tree of the Knowledge of Good and Evil, and then told Adam it was fine. Adam, probably still thinking with his naughty bits at the time of course complied and ate some. Supposedly an omniscient God did not see how this was what today we call a "bad idea".
The story just does not work when read literally.
By inference from the rules of the tale, I'd say either Adam and Eve would eat the fruit of the Tree of Life and life forever, but not in the Garden since God on that account would presumably chuck him/them out;, or they would not eat any relevant fruit, but continue to enjoy the comforts of the Garden of Eden until they died of old age like the other animals.What would have been the outcome, if Adam hadn’t eaten the fruit, ie., disobeyed the command not to eat from that tree?
Ahm, if you're never going to die, doesn't that make you immortal?I never said immortal, and neither does the text imply that.
I can't find any reports on the life-cycle of angels in the Tanakh, so I'll refrain from devising an answer.Angels have endless life, but they are not immortal. In fact, many of them — Satan and the demons [ = ‘the dragon and his angels’ - Rev.12:9] — will be destroyed.
I think I responded to that before. I pointed out that at the time Eve and Adam respectively ate the fruit, they had no knowledge of good and evil because God had deliberately withheld it from them, which made them incapable of forming an intention to do wrong and therefore incapable of sinning. And they were in that condition when they ate the fruit. Note too that they thus had no notion that disobedience was wrong.Because they disobeyed.
Genesis 3:17…
“And to Adam he said: “Because you listened to your wife’s voice and ate from the tree concerning which I gave you this command, ‘You must not eat from it,’….
As your quote of Genesis 3:22-23 says ─ though once more I emphasize that it's a folktale with no historical basis ─ what worried God was that their acquisition of the KGE made them like [him] and if they then ate from the tree of life and became immortal they'd have the same powers as [he] had, so [he] chucked them out of the Garden instead of moving the trees to a safe place.And vss 22 & 23….
“Jehovah God then said: “Here the man has become like one of us in knowing good and bad. Now in order that he may not put his hand out and take fruit also from the tree of life and eat and live forever,—” 23 With that Jehovah God expelled him from the garden of Eʹden to cultivate the ground from which he had been taken.
It was so that Adam wouldn’t eat of the Tree of Life…. It had nothing to do with the Tree of Knowledge, anymore.
No response? I thought that you did not believe that fairy tale. Or if you prefer fable. As history it fails. That is what certain Christians do and I explained how that is a failed approach to the myth. It can still work as a morality tale. If you one tries to interpret it literally one insults God.Have a great day ...