Best? I think it's awful - it's ugly and random 
Simple? Very, I suppose. But then again, Turkish is also simple - very simple. Only a few irregular verbs, and one irregular noun, I think. I think Esperanto is a little bit TOO simple, but it also has difficulties because of all of the accent marks - the ĥ, ŝ, ĉ, ĵ, ĝ and there's one on the u . Most Esperantists use the "x-system", meaning that ĉ will be written as cx, ŝ will be written as sx. Some use the "h-system", but that's freaky. For example, hhameleono, as opposed to hxameleono, for ĥameleono (chameleon). I'm not sure about the ŭ with the h-system, so if you accept my offer t'teach you, it will be the x-system.
Do you need to know, like, the pronunciation, or do you already know it?
Sed, se vi volas, mi instruos vin. (but if you want, I will teach you)
Ĝis ("Bye"!)!
Simple? Very, I suppose. But then again, Turkish is also simple - very simple. Only a few irregular verbs, and one irregular noun, I think. I think Esperanto is a little bit TOO simple, but it also has difficulties because of all of the accent marks - the ĥ, ŝ, ĉ, ĵ, ĝ and there's one on the u . Most Esperantists use the "x-system", meaning that ĉ will be written as cx, ŝ will be written as sx. Some use the "h-system", but that's freaky. For example, hhameleono, as opposed to hxameleono, for ĥameleono (chameleon). I'm not sure about the ŭ with the h-system, so if you accept my offer t'teach you, it will be the x-system.
Do you need to know, like, the pronunciation, or do you already know it?
Sed, se vi volas, mi instruos vin. (but if you want, I will teach you)
Ĝis ("Bye"!)!
