• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

M
Reaction score
3,130

Profile posts Latest activity Postings About

  • I'm all for a Hobbit snuggle fest reading. (Although, I just devoured in 2 days... and I was being really careful to read all the words too. It's just too good to put down.)
    Thank you! It has been a very trying time for me, and I truly appreciate the kind words. :D (I most definitely know which ones) :p
    Gave my children Friskies once, they dug it out of the bowl and just looked at it!
    Hey M, have you seen NaykidApe? I could have sworn I left him in your visitor messages.
    I've gotta run now - this is a drive-by helloing. I'm off for my first snowboarding of the year.

    (it's like waterboarding, but colder)
    This question may have been asked before, but what did the Moon landing missions add to the science of cosmology? Did it change any earlier theories about how things are supposed to work? (Aside from confirming that the Moon is made of cheese, of course).
    In regard to what I said about no models showing how the Earth was able to get past Planetismal form without spiraling into the sun, here's a Time magazine article discussing this oft-ignored subject among astronomers, there really is no working model of how the Earth was able to form: Why the Sun Didn't Destroy Earth: Astronomers' New Theory - TIME

    And even if they say that the problem is solved by their new theory, they are either forgetting or ignoring that this would involve the Earth grinding itself into nothing.
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
  • Loading…
Top