But you see my point is exactly that: peopole should not be "acceptable" of the improbable. Thats the whole issue.
Science is not (should not be) about accepting improbable things.
Hello Zadok (and a happy new year),
The multiverse theory is not really related to your 11 dimensional explanation. What you talk about is the M-Theory (which is based on the String theory, which is often named as one theory about multiverses).
Anyway. [/FONT][/COLOR]I do not criticize any...
And you never pondered the question how it comes that he doesnt act or appear here every now and then? Afterall he supposedly did that rather often in former times.
Why would there not be an "excuse" for not knowing this? Afterall it doesnt follow logically nor is there ay real evidence.
And...
I do not mean his "place of living".
I mean any indication of his existence including his acts.
God however seems absent. Not only as a being but also as an actor.
Topic 4:
Biological authority.
I found the following statement of yours striking:
Now I dont want to sound insulting but this is rather obvious nonsense.
Most of what people call pedophilia today was not considered so thousand years ago (including by the way biblical times). What we now...
@DuneMeister
I am somewhat torn between thinking that we two are quite near at some points on the one hand and thinking that we are rather far apart on the other hand.
Again I must apologize if I rearrange my answers a bit but I think its best for the discussion.
I left out the part...
Well if a theistic God would just be a being from outside this continuum, then it could be any "normal species" that exists in another continuum and created this continuum.
As analogy: For a microworld created in a lab the scientist who created it would be God.
In my view a theistic God is not...
Not if they were from "outer" space meaning outside of the continuum we can see.
I was not "advocating" non-belief. Actually "non-belief" is not a term i think to be valid at all. The argument is made to show the limits and and the consequences of putting a burdon of "disproove" somewhere.
If...
As we know there are enough people that believe that either Jesus was not the last prophet (muslims) or that he was not one at all (jews, atheists).
There is no particular reason why Jesus would have to be Gods last messenger, especially if we look at the current state of the "teachings" and the...
And you get that "knowledge" from where?
It would actually amaze me that "we" do "our best" to drown him.
Believers tend not to do that.
And believers in different religions also don't.
Why would they if they believed in God.
I guess YOU do not do your best either to drown him.
And most...
I read there:
So any "alien" from outer space works as a theistic God? ;)
I think you err. The reason why God or a teapot was invented is not a good foundation for evaluating the claims themselves.
If you are not in agreement with my analogy using "known invented" things to "proove a point" we...
I find it strange to say that.
As I mentioned already God supposedly has done (still does) many things. Yet interestingly while for example a whole city should have been able to tell you about him some millenia ago, you don't see any manifestations of him or his acts nowadays.
Aint that somewhat...
I do NOT mean this insulting but could you actually tell me what "generic theism" is?
I haven't so far found any single defintion of "a" God by any religion so far that they (the followers) were willing to stick to till the end.
In my view when we speak about God we most often speak about a...