Yep, as i mentioned earlier already. It just depends on whether the person is a muslim or not and if it is one then it depends on the knowledge of the quran.
IF (Person==MUSLIM) AND (PERSON.knowsIslam()==True) {
verseAccepted = False
} ELSE {
verseAccepted = dependsOnYourText();
}
Of course. the problem is already in the first sentence.
A muslim CANT (already by mere definition ) accept any verse as better than the quran.
Thats why in my experiments i told several muslims that my verses were from the quran. Those that had not memorized it didnt criticize them at all.
Says who ?
You know you really need to start THINKING.
Who are you to think you KNOW that "any" other realm is non-existent?
You think the multiuniverse theory is a prooven nonsense? WOW. Please do publish a paper on that idea. I am sure i will have my fun reading the comments you will get...
I "interpret" this as stating that you believe any scripture to be just as good as any other book, being made by man and trying to "teach" something. Would this be correct?
To produce a chapter that is as successfull as the whole quran is somewhat strange a request i would say. Nobody can see that in the surah. I guess you mean to produce a surah that is as inspirational to people as one in the quran.
Sorry but THAT challenge DEFINETLY has been met already. Take...
Now You are accusing me of doingt things WITHOUT proof?
Please DO quote my post where i have said that i was going to present proof.
If not we can simply conclude that you are not only wrong, not only stubborn, not only inconsistent but also a liar.
I am waiting.
Ok ..
what confuses me is the following.
Scripture tells you coffee is hot.
You take a cup and you see it IS hot.
Scripture doesnt tell you anything else about the coffee. You investigate for yourself. Fair.
Now lets take the sripture again.
Scripture tells you God has a beard or that the...
I think you might have entered the discussion at the wrong point and misunderstood something.
In the end my statement was that the challenge that muslims are so eager to mention is nonsensical. I have seen this challenge already being met as well as being denied. The difference solely depended...
First of all the burdon of proof lies on those that make a claim about the existence of something. That would be you.
Secondly I knew you wouldnt provide it. Now i would like to quote YOU. You said about me...
Well aint it sheer "hypocrisy" what we see then here? You claim to have proof that...
*PING*
Not entirely true. You can disproove certain defined gods. As soon as "god" is not an abstract term for "anything" but gets concrete you can argue.
*PONG*
Again wrong.
If there is an infinitesimal amount of sand, infinitesimal----a value approaching zero, you sweep what little there is away and then there is STILL an infinitesimal amount of sand. It just is somewhere else, namely 2 meters away !
Indeed it is. Thats why no reasonable man would demand such a disproove.
All the more interesting that you claim to have one which of course is impossible.
Well what you "think" might even be correct but the problem is that the premise" imagined" is already not proven.
Take a pantheistic god or a panentheistic one and you run into trouble.
Say that God incorporates the natural world.
You could even assume some "alien" lifeform being outside this...
First of all i did not make the claim that you assert. I claimed that i have created verses and that these verses were evaluated by muslims with and without knowledge with different results depending clearly on their memorization of the quran. Thus i claimed that the challenge itself is...