Thx :)
As to your question ... people will handle anything if they only want to believe and are stubborn enough not to listen. Some people can't accept a truth that doesn't appeal to them.
You never give up will ya ?
Ok lets play the game:
Earth - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
About 70.8%of the surface is covered by water, ..... The remaining 29.2% not covered by water consists ....
Don't believe in wikipedia perhaps ...
See here the reference:
8(o) Introduction to the Oceans...
i see no "bigoted deprecation of a peoples effort to understand" something when someome sees a book as worthless that the other sees as worthy.
Perhaps you think that someone who is religious deserves respect just because he is religious. If so it would be interesting to see how you come to...
I am sorry, i still do not understand it.
I do see what you write but i don't see your position.
Is it to be taken literally in the sense that it was 7 days or not ?
Unfortunately there are not 11 planets. So the information is wrong. And what will you do now ? Will you now stop being muslim ? I guess not.[/FONT][/SIZE][/SIZE][/FONT]
ok
....
Ok ... let me summarize this:
1) You state people become less smart
2) You state that people should or must read books about topics in order to understand, thus asking people to get educated.
3) You state that you yourself have not read any books apart of islamic ones or ones that are...
I am not sure I understood what you said.
Do you mean God knew that man would err and once believe in evolution and the bible states what is true in order to make people once realize the error and come to believe in it again ?
I don't think that this is arrogance. Objectively seen it is a valid and reasonable assumption.
But i think it is very easy and often convenient to accuse others of arrogance. :(
I think that this guy just does what any person does when he is not willing to abandon his religion in the face of reality ... he speaks about his religious book belonging to a special "genre" that must be "understood" properly.
Of course he now (today) can say that creationists are wrong...
In one thread you spoke about people becoming less smart.
Here in this one you said (i quoted it already before):
I took that as a statement meaning that people should do research and learn by books in order to understand what is right and what is wrong. And i think you mean that people ought...
My guess is that he read Harun Yahya, my most famous modern imposter.
My second guess would be that he has scanned through the quran and science sites like "Is it truth" (IT-IS-TRUTH :: Welcome to the Truth), my second most famous imposters.
I have had many debates and dicsussions with both...
An interesting defnition.
Here where I live the official definition for porn is any direct portrait of the sexual act. So the "mechanical act" is visible.
I would prefer this definition and leave the "degrading" out of the discussion or include it in a seperate term.
Wa aleikum assalam,
Actually I think you are doing a mistake here.
Your first sentence is the claim and since you claim it you must provide evidence and not ask others to verify your initial claim.