And what are these quotes supposed to explain ?
You see one can claim a lot with quotes without reaching anything.
See here...
You mean this one ?
Please spare me that name. I went through some of his books. There are not many books about his subjects that are worse than his.
For me Satan doesn't exist at all.
Of course he would be if he existed and did such a rather poor job.
It is not as if he would not have been more capable of doing better in convincing people (if he existed).
Says who ? What evidence can you show me ?
Well I do see that as a problem. Humans...
Why would the mere existence of something render that something perfect ?
"Perfection" would have to be defined anyway.
My opinion is simply that if a god existed that would have created the universe according to the scriptures, then this universe would look much different from the one we see.
I remember the saying that the greatest archievement of satan would be to make people believe he didn't exist. According to that logic one must presume that God is Satan.
Frankly spoken: If God just showed up I could take that far better than to reveal himself by means which make people think...
Science is more of a method to analyze nature and gain knowledge about the world. Religion is lots and lots of claims without consistent verifications and defacto contradicting reality. None deserve or require "faith".
I think this is not a goo argument since it would render god a rather poor manufacturer.
After all this universe might be big, but it is far from great.
Doesnt really sound convincing.
Strange then, that it would be created in a way that made most scientific people assume that there was no...
It is not worth the effort.
I did that some years ago already. Frankly ... it is actually a waste of time to even consider writing something about so obviously a false claim.