Ok, so do you all agree that the belief in God is irrational? If not, I will continue with my argument. We established that something must be described in order to have a rational belief in it. If you still want to argue that, just say so. I will quote myself again.
hehe flying would be cool. But, superpowers would convert me. It's not the other way around. Just cuz ur christian, doesn't mean you get them. Sorry :(
I am, but you keep arguing with my premises, so i have to defend them; again and again and again. If we can move on to the next part of my argument, which is why you cannot describe God, then that would be great.
All I've argued for is that something must be described in order to have a rational belief in it. All i've used is a hypothetical situation, which can be used in arguments.
If you go up to a man who has never heard of God and say, "I believe in God and so you should so you don't go to hell," and he says, "What's God?" What do you tell him? Do you tell him that you don't have to describe to that man what or who God is? He must be described, or we don't know what...
Do you see why something must be described in order to have a rational belief in it? This is my question right now. If you are confused, then read about the urpals again.
Look, will you please not go off on a tangent? that's not where I am in my argument. If you can't keep with me on a logical level, then I shouldn't even be talking to you. We are at the point where
I told you why something must be described to have any rational belief in it. If we don't...
Unie is another word for something that is undescribed. I meant to use urpal for consistency sake, but unie means the same thing, something that is undescribed.
I told you why something must be described to have any rational belief in it. If we don't know what an urpal is, then to say, "I believe in urpals, is just a meaningless sound." Without any descripription of an unie, proof of it's existence is incoherent.This applies to God as well.
And it seems he left. To go on with this argument would be to go on to admit irrationality of the belief in a God. Anybody else want to pick up where he left off, be my guest.