"You do realize that for directed panspermia to occur requires life to already exist, right?"
1- no mention of panspermia was made in my post or by Dawkin's
2- we clone organisms and genetically modify organisms all the time. Not a natural process. Do you consider those evolution?
3- You are...
1- Panspermia is only one theory of Intelligent Design and not mentioned as a theory I was promoting in my OP
2- The intelligent design Dawkin's described involved an advanced alien race.
3- I am not talking about abiogenesis and if you do not know the difference in that and ID just say so...
No and the movie is the movie and Dawkin's quotes are not the movie.
Nothing added changed what I implied. He made it a possibility that life on this planet could be intelligently designed.
Nowhere did I say some evolutionary mechanism was not used in that process and I made it clear ID did...
Yes the evidence for Intelligent Design so far
Top U.S. Astronomers Tell Congress That Extraterrestrial Life Exists Without Question
Two top astronomers from the SETI Institute (Search For Extraterrestrial Intelligence) recently appeared in front of the congressional House Science and...
Whether the movie received rave reviews or criticized is irrelevant.
Adding in the additional comments of Dawkin's did nothing to change my OP as was explained.
As you can see from that additional information it does not change what I premised in my OP because the debate is not between...
Are you addressing these to a specific member?
If not please start your own discussion as links with no reference to what they discussing or why they are relevant is just a distraction.
The immature person in this debate is you. You did not address my posts with any substance and just ad hominem attacks and now telling me to leave because you don't like you opinions challenged.
You may notice I have posted 3 new discussions and have had many long discussion threads with other...
No I took the quote direct from the link I supplied and it is available all over the web. It was not edited or or taken out of context since I quoted it verbatim.
There was no refutation and the poster only added additional statements Hawkin's made and those statements made absolutely no...
"Ad hominems do not help your case. If you can't debate like an adult and support your claims when you make them, then don't enter these debate forums."
Then why do you use them in every single one of your posts?
"If you can't debate like an adult"
That is an ad hominem attack.
"then don't...
"Of course it's "possible"
Thanks and if it is possible it does not require a God and is not magical.
"This has nothing to do with what I've said. I didn't even mention Dawkins in this post."
You interjected yourself into a discussion between two members where Dawkin's was used as evidence...
You made the claim that math was required.
The burden of proof is on you.
Where is your math for the odds of a watch forming from parts in a box or the odds of surviving jumping off the empire state building?
I made it clear that any intelligent person can understand those as highly...
You did not make an argument.
I posted the quote from Dawkins.
Are you claiming that is not his quote if so present you evidence or I will take it you are a liar.
BEN STEIN: What do you think is the possibility that Intelligent Design might turn out to be the answer to some issues in...
Word of advice: stop trolling and badgering people when you can not respond to the post because it deflates your own theory. If you want to prove anything I said is wrong mathematically then I gave you the process for determining odds and you are welcome to do that.
Until then all you are...
No there is one science of evolution and many theories as you have been shown.
No theory is beyond argument or it would not be a theory and would be fact.
What do you know you finally got something right!
"Evolution" is the name we give to the process through which existing forms and functions are modified over time in living populations"
Right and it is not just one process and that process can take on many mechanisms and are not all natural...
Natural selection is just one of many theories of evolution.
Intelligent Design is not abiogenisis and Dawkin's made it clear it is possible.
Your opinion of Intelligent design and creationism is immature unless you want to claim Dawkin's was promoting creationism and God.
As has already been...
Again:
Which has nothing to do with my question- read for comprehension please:
Does Intelligent Design require a God or Super natural being?
Intelligent Design does not replace evolution and no where did I say that the designer(s) did not use some evolution mechanism in their design.
Front...
The only liar here is you.
If you want to do the math and prove my statement wrong I gave you the way to calculate the odds.
The burden of proof is on you.