1- learn the difference in micro and macro evolution and then you will answer your own question.
2- That definition lends itself almost entirely to only the theory of Natural Selection and micro evolution.
3- You have already been shown you do not have a simple definition of evolution and you...
1- Health Ed. Specialist includes biology and anatomy. You know- the same subjects doctors take. And you?
2- I posited nothing and if your imagine went wild do not blame me.
3- If you want to start your own post to ask your question by all means do that instead of trying to hijack my...
It is watered down as it applies itself almost entirely to evolution within a species not from one species to another.
To call both evolution is an extreme over simplification as many scientists have said natural selection may not be the mechanism used for macroevolution and there may be...
1- Now show us all where he used the word "panspermia" in that description? You can't and that is a word you threw in to justify your agenda.
2- There is a definition of the science of evolution. There is no one theory of evolution as there are many theories of evolution.
Here is one theory...
1- "more or less" which is the crux of the problem as the definition has been watered down to make any mating and off spring an evolution.
2- I have no doubt that natural selection occurs and genetics are passed on. That in no way bridges the gap of evolution from one species to another which...
"That's exactly what he was talking about."
1- No that is you OPINION of what he was talking about and as we have already determined you have no science background and just an agenda so your opinion is highly biased.
2- There is no theory of evolution that encompasses all theories,. That is...
1- Secondary Education. Minor in Health Education.
""all mutations are influenced intelligently"
2- Here again you put quotations marks on something only you said. It does not matter one bit if all mutations are influenced genetically and not all evoltion is a result of natural selection.
3-...
1- You made your agenda very clear.
2- nowhere does Dawkin's mention panspermia. Do not interject your lack of evolution theories onto other people please.
3- There is no definition of evolution that encompasses all the theories of evolution. You apparently do not grasp the basic fact that...
1- M.Ed. professional educator and have taught just about every subject at one time in my career.
2- the evidence is that we already do it on this earth and scientists believe life on other planets exist and could be intelligent. More research will provide more evidence.
3- You deliberately...
No you tried and failed to claim added words somehow undermined my premise. It did not and you failed at that agenda.
I am a professional educator and science is one of many subjects I have taught. I am fluent enough in science to hold my own and I do back up my opinions with quotes from...
1- For a non scientists you seem to think your opinion of what things should be called has some weight- it doesn't!
"unless said cloning leads to widespread mutations"
2- Yes and that is called intelligent genetic modification. That explains how intelligent design could have started life on...
Yes this is a forum and the next time you interject please take the time to read the entire thread so you do not make that mistake again.
I posted the quotes from Dawkin's that substantiated my position. Where are your links or quotes from experts in the field?
"I've never claimed to be a...
"therefore all evolution is caused/influenced by intelligence"
Now show me where I said that since you put quotations around it?
Now you made a huge stink in another thread about quotes being edited and taken out of context and here you are making up a quote I never even said.
Hypocrite!
You made the claim that math was required.
The burden of proof is on you.
Where is your math for the odds of a watch forming from parts in a box or the odds of surviving jumping off the empire state building?
I made it clear that any intelligent person can understand those as highly...
You interjected yourself into another conversation and tried to hijack it to your own agenda.
Your opinion has no weight and your opinion is not facts. What is your science degree and background in and where are your published research papers that are peer reviewed?
Do not claim experience you...