As I've said before, just because there are multiple ideas of God, it doesn't mean that he doesn't exist, I don't understand why your still pushing that argument.
I find it humorous, how your completely avoiding the arguments that I made for the Resurrection a couple pages back, along with...
As I said, the argument for the resurrection was made about a page or so back. I don't really want to copy paste it again to be honest. And how would different opinions on the existence of God disprove the main idea of His existence?
Actually yes, I do. Before I present it, I would like to state that there is not nearly enough evidence on the side of any other ideas of God, to take them seriously, I'm curious as to why you would think there is. And I thought I already proved the God-hood of Christ, through my points and...
I assume you didn't see that this was an excerpt from a man named John Martignoni; not me. But, in so being, I whole-heartily agree with him. Who's the God I believe in? The only one who ever actually both claimed and demonstrated and form of God-hood; Jesus Christ. No other religions even...
I would like to add this as well:
This is an excerpt from a man named John Martignoni:
Challenge/Response/Strategy
Evidence for the Existence of God
Why are you here? That was the question that was asked in a video you watched last week...“Why are you here?” And it wasn’t asking...
?
[I'm curious as to how you've come to the conclusion that the one who created all time energy, and matter can be limited as to what He can do. Tuesday (or any other day) are merely arbitrary terms we use to describe time. How does this affect God? Also, what kind of action specifically...
. The resurrection of Jesus. It seems to me that there are four established facts which constitute inductive evidence for the resurrection of Jesus:
Fact #1: After his crucifixion, Jesus was buried by Joseph of Arimathea in the tomb. This fact is highly significant because it means that the...
Finally, I want to consider one more saying: Jesus’s saying on the date of his second coming in Mark 13.32: "But of that day or that hour no man knows, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father." This is an authentic saying of the historical Jesus because the later Church...
On the basis of the five reasons I listed, we are justified in accepting the historical reliability of what the gospels say about Jesus unless they are proven to be wrong. At the very least, we cannot assume they are wrong until proven right. The person who denies the gospels’ reliability must...
I don’t have enough time to talk about all of these. So let me say something about the first and the last points.
1. There was insufficient time for legendary influences to expunge the historical facts. No modern scholar thinks of the gospels as bald-faced lies, the result of a massive...
Last time we saw that the New Testament documents are the most important historical sources for Jesus of Nazareth. The so-called apocryphal gospels are forgeries which came much later and are for the most part elaborations of the four New Testament gospels.
This doesn’t mean that there aren’t...
Hi there! I'm a Catholic Christian and would like to put a solid defence up for my faith. First of all, I'll start off with apologetics for the existence of God, then ask questions and make statements. Then, I'll retrieve information in support of the resurrection.
I'd say the first thing that...