So what, It does not matter if they know or not, they are not comfortable with a man in the women's bathroom. This used to be common logic until the loony left got involved.
No, it was also applied to misinformation and true information that was censored such as the Russian collusion and hunter laptop hoaxes.
I never defended a right to threaten anyone. See above. And as far as the left goes, look on X, there are lots of people advocating to assasinate Trump...
The solution is to have single occupancy bathrooms that anyone can use as well as mens and womens bathrooms. I am sure they have these. Women are not comfortable having transwomen in womens bathrooms. I think that is understandable. We should accommodate trans people, but just not in womens...
The left has attacked free speech through successfully flagging social platforms such as twitter, facebook etc. The DOJ targeting conservative groups/individuals such as catholics, parents at school board meetings and pro life groups, lies most of the media have told about Trump/conservatives...
And this is why we voted for him. Finally someone who will address our issues. We are not going on a journey we have not gone before but a journey we were on 20+ years ago in many ways before the dems started acting on an authoritarian philosophy. We liked what Trump did in his first term and...
The DOJ elected not to prosecute these allegations which meets the definition of exoneration. I am ok with the report coming out, but if it is just he said she said then we will never know the truth.
We will see. Both chambers need to agree to adjourn for more than 3 days. There is a clause that says if the chambers cannot agree then the president can adjourn them. Not sure what those requirements are.
https://constitution.congress.gov/browse/essay/artI-S5-C4-1/ALDE_00013353/
The supreme court said this (2014):
The Supreme Court ultimately adopted a relatively broad interpretation of the Clause in National Labor Relations Board v. Noel Canning.4 With respect to the meaning of the phrase Recess of the Senate, the Court concluded that the phrase applied to both...
Many times,
https://nypost.com/2022/09/15/white-house-doubles-down-on-kamala-harris-claim-that-border-is-secure/
Yes, they did not vote for the bill because it was a bad bill for reasons I have already laid out.
Why did the dems say for three years the border was secure and just fine? They never asked for this bill until election time when it was clear we had problems, and Trump did not need this bill either. It is a bad bill for the reasons I explained. You cannot fathom anything that does not make...