Left brainers stop at the emergent property, left -right balanced seek to know from where the emergent property emerged, and from where did that emerge, and from where did that emerge, etc. until the whole is apprehended.
You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make it drink. It amuses me how atheists baulk at anything that indicates there is more to existence than the parts, have you heard the saying, the whole is greater than the sum of the parts? You want to see a part perform to believe, rather than see...
Consciousness from non-consciousness is not possible, there is intrinsic consciousness in all of nature. Left-hemisphere oriented scientists are just not yet aware of the nature's awareness.
How many times do I have to tell you that I understand the biology, my question is, since you believe that sub-atomic particles, atoms, molecules, etc., have no consciousness, then no matter how they could come together, there could never be consciousness. But there is, so that means there is...
Aware means to know, conscious, aware, etc., it is not confined to just human experience.
For example, here is a reference to a scientific article on Electron consciousness.
Conscious Control of an Electron | Bryan | Journal of Consciousness Exploration & Research
I get that TETRAPOD VERTEBRATES are aware.
But do you get that all the parts that comprise the TETRAPOD VERTEBRATES have no awareness, how can non-awareness, in whatever quantity and combination, produce awareness?
Please explain how you think this possible?
Then you apparently believe that human awareness arose from non-awareness. That's my point, how could awareness possibly emerge from non-awareness, either from outside or inside the human.