You make it sound like God favors very[i/] clumsy techniques.
If I were God, and I had a particular desire that mankind should be in one or other particular condition, genetically, socially, or at all, well, I'd just snap my omnipotent fingers and ─ voilà!
I pointed out that the only manner in which mathematical concepts are known to exist is as concepts, notions, things imagined, in individual brains.
If you think that's wrong, just show me an uninstantiated 2 out there in the world external to the self.
I asked you for a peer-reviewed paper, or at the least a report in a reputable journal of science, that affirms (or as the case may be) the claims in the video.
You apparently don't have one.
Enjoy your day.
I'm leaving because you're offering nothing solid in support of your claims. If there's laziness here, it isn't on my side. It's not my job to make your case for you.
The only way "universals" are known to exist is as concepts, notions, things imagined in individual brains.
Thus when no brains are involved, no "universals" are involved.
Concepts, of course, can be very useful, and we employ them in their thousands every day. But search the universe all...
You read it carefully, then. What exactly is the problem, and I'll see if I can help.
You can't make claims about real things like that unless you have satisfactory evidence. So what do you mean by "point situation" and what evidence shows that it used to be different, and when?
Some things...
Which group, then, did you intend to denote when you said "the Left" in your thread heading?
And what is your evidence that "the Left" should take the blame for the shooting attempts?
So "God" is an experience, an idea, not an independent real entity, you say? God is a phenomenon of one's brain, and so can't be found out there in reality?
That seems fair.
As you know, having read up on tectonics, the supercontinent Pangaea began to break apart about 200 million years ago ─ see >Pangaea - Wikipedia<. It had come apart to form the present continents by 60 million years ago.
.
That's irrelevant.
What you have to find is that extra 1.1 billion...
That tells me it's most likely you don't understand either of them.
Assuming you believe in informing yourself from credible sources ─ and if you don't, I apologize for interrupting whatever it is you're otherwise doing ─ you might try reading this ─ >Punctuated equilibrium - Wikipedia<
Thanks, but I'm looking for a peer-reviewed paper, or at the least a report in a reputable journal of science, that affirms (or as the case may be) the claims in the video.
In my student days, Philosophy 101, we learnt of Plato and his other-worldly forms. After an amount of reflection on the question, I dismissed the idea of forms. The triangle of geometry, for example, is entirely conceptual, and being two-dimensional has no equivalent in reality, though of...
The bible makes no particular distinction between the landform before and after the Flood.
Nor, as far as I'm aware, does the geology of the Semitic lands support the notion of any uniquely mountain-covering flood in the last ten thousand years.
So where's your evidence?
There would still be...