No one knows how evolution works. They say mutations are random and something about the environment ‘drives’ changes by way of survival and reproduction. Not a very exact science.
Twisting the truth is noted there again by you but that’s to be expected. I clearly wrote ‘challenging the atheist liars and science’, two separate articles. Knowledgeable Bible believers know that unbelievers and scoffers will increase in the end times, Christians have absolutely no motivation...
What is the ‘obvious vested interest’ of Bible believers as opposed to the financial gain and fame that drives scientists. Many I know are driven by greed, write eulogies about each other, self announce they’re world renown, when the general public knows nothing of them. Aside of that there’s...
Don’t get manic! Rather think calmly, what precisely have you demonstrated natural selection is in your last two posts on this thread. What ‘mechanism’!? There isn’t one.
Not of course, all mutations would be relevant to your view of natural selection evolution. What have only germline cells, apart from being passed on to progeny, got anything to do with the “natural selection” part of your evolution theory.
That observed fact only demonstrates the permanence of...
Sorry, I thought you would go look it up once pointed out:-
NCI Dictionary of Cancer Terms.
The exact mechanism of mutations, if found, would be facts. Natural selection is just a hypothesis. Facts have the potential to disprove hypotheses. Natural selection by variation is a very vague term...
Mutations don’t just happen as a result of reproduction, you are showing your ignorance here. Knowing the exact mechanism of mutations is relevant in turning evolution hypotheses into fact. Facts could and would invalidate natural selection ToE and other hypotheses.
Regarding statistics as...
You have never observed a mutation happen in real time hence have no idea how it happens. Comparing genomes is an in exact science, just because some species have similarities doesn’t mean the have a common ancestor, the evidence to suggest they do is hypothetical and undemonstrated. I explained...
It is conjecture and assumption as the process as to why these mutations occur has not been given.
Deception is not lying by God when you have already been given His Word and ignored it.
You have no proof about mutated versions of genes just conjecture by comparing genomes. The statistics of different mutations is the same between humans and chimpanzees because they have existed as long, since 6000 years ago side by side. Do you get it?
Just as anticipated, your evidence is based on modelling and is highly theoretical. This is what was said in one and will be the same for any ‘evidence’ you give trying to predict life thousands of years ago.
“It is basic to science that we have never tested all possible hypotheses...
Your position is just as easy to challenge, has no reason for existence and full of unevidenced assertions. What you call evidence can be reduced to only the fact that mutations of genes occur, that’s all. We creationists believe that as well.
There is a God because stars do not make themselves. The remaining dust doesn’t coalesce to form rocks. These theoretical rocks do not collide at super high velocity to create orbiting planets, they would form dust again. Life doesn’t make itself by chemicals reacting in nature on their own...