• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Search results

  1. Apostle John

    How does the story of Adam and Eve compatible with science?

    Full skeletons (not like Lucy, only 40%) or just another bunch of deformed bones that could be put together as fabricated ‘evidence’.
  2. Apostle John

    How does the story of Adam and Eve compatible with science?

    Don’t you see the nonsense. You’ve given arbitrary names to mutations and say, because you think there is a small minority of positive ones, they drive the fantasy tree of life. Even repeating the example of humans when they haven’t evolved into anything else. what’s your point.
  3. Apostle John

    How does the story of Adam and Eve compatible with science?

    No, when I was finally given evidence asked for I spent 2 seconds exposing the nonsense.
  4. Apostle John

    How does the story of Adam and Eve compatible with science?

    You haven’t shown anything factual that shows the ToE to be correct and it will go on like, just more and more babble to confuse the unwary of what your project is. There’s no such thing as a species according to you, it’s actually quite laughable how you’ve collectively engineered ToE.
  5. Apostle John

    How does the story of Adam and Eve compatible with science?

    Is it not more unsubstantiated drivel. They can probably breed.
  6. Apostle John

    How does the story of Adam and Eve compatible with science?

    That link says this: ‘However, it is unclear whether any of the examples of ring species cited by scientists actually permit gene flow from end to end, with many being debated and contested.’ Are you making up nonsense as you go along? A desperate attempt to win debates with disinformation?
  7. Apostle John

    How does the story of Adam and Eve compatible with science?

    You know an ape cannot mate with a human to produce anything right? Now give an example in just one of these experiments where a different species has been observed on that basis. Surely you can do that.
  8. Apostle John

    How does the story of Adam and Eve compatible with science?

    Why can you not supply a single quotation from just one of these experiments to show how a different kind of organism has been made and not just species within species changes. We creationists believe the latter happens. You will probably have come up with a different definition of species.
  9. Apostle John

    How does the story of Adam and Eve compatible with science?

    Why can you not supply a single quotation from just one of these experiments to show how a different kind of organism has been made and not just species within species changes. We creationists believe the latter happens. You will probably have come up with a different definition of species.
  10. Apostle John

    How does the story of Adam and Eve compatible with science?

    None of that has demonstrated macroevolution. But hey, if you think it has, as you state, point a quotation out. I cannot see a single one.
  11. Apostle John

    How does the story of Adam and Eve compatible with science?

    In your example what 0.001% of so called ‘beneficial mutations’ have been seen in humans and what’s happened to the 0.999% of other mutations and how does any of it show macroevolution.
  12. Apostle John

    How does the story of Adam and Eve compatible with science?

    I understand ToE is a complete lie based on pure speculation with absolutely no experimental data to support it. The evolutionists you follow believe in macroevolution, have made up the term beneficial mutation to support it and assume differences in the dna of different species are positive...
  13. Apostle John

    How does the story of Adam and Eve compatible with science?

    0.001%, as guessed by the the source above is very relevant showing your beliefs to be absolutely absurd.
  14. Apostle John

    How does the story of Adam and Eve compatible with science?

    Nope, I actually said: …and that was only because I had heard of the term beneficial mutation. So I looked at that and it said this: “About 90 percent of DNA is thought to be non-functional, and mutations there generally have no effect. The remaining 10 percent is functional, and has an...
  15. Apostle John

    How does the story of Adam and Eve compatible with science?

    Not for the following. I’ll ask it again: I’d have to see evidence of the percentage of mutations you’ve been told are ‘beneficial mutations’ as opposed to those having neutral/negative effects before I can see if that is a reason that you believe in ToE. I doubt anything will be given but...
  16. Apostle John

    How does the story of Adam and Eve compatible with science?

    Lucy is what I call fabricated evidence.
  17. Apostle John

    How does the story of Adam and Eve compatible with science?

    I haven’t looked into it. You (or other atheist) should be able to give me the percentage. Why cant you?
  18. Apostle John

    How does the story of Adam and Eve compatible with science?

    I’ve tried to debate the topic, haven’t called anyone nasty names for you to give me nasty names? I would just like (and expect) the evidence asked for. Your rules are your rules, I have no control of what goes on on your forum.
  19. Apostle John

    How does the story of Adam and Eve compatible with science?

    Yes that one. It would be so sad if you Richard Dawkins Award recipients didn’t have a reunion somewhere.
  20. Apostle John

    How does the story of Adam and Eve compatible with science?

    Have you managed to get Dr Eugenie Scott to participate in this project? I don’t know much about her debating days but would be a gentleman if I knew which username she used.
Top