• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Search results

  1. A

    Finally. Good riddance to Obamacare.

    None of this follows from what I wrote and is just you appealing to pseudo-intellectualism. I spoke of healing, you answer that with a one-size fits all approach rarely works. Healing is clearly putting people first, whereas treatment is clearly putting ideas/methodology above the concern for...
  2. A

    Finally. Good riddance to Obamacare.

    I'm pretty sure I've brought this up before on RF, but I've seen plenty of evidence of national Dems dismissing science when it comes to politics around eCigs/vaping. Schumer for sure, and if I did a wee bit of investigating, I know I can name other names. They (Dems) are waging a clear...
  3. A

    Finally. Good riddance to Obamacare.

    Yes. People dying prematurely will happen for as long as there are people on this planet. Healing goes (far) further than treatment. Literally like comparing a mountain to a mole hill.
  4. A

    The Problem of Misinformation

    How is that different than any other POTUS in American history?
  5. A

    Finally. Good riddance to Obamacare.

    I have read every post in the thread and decided to come back to this one. First things first, I'm glad ACA was repealed. Not super duper glad, but it does undo a bit of legacy for O, and it was a political football for last 5 or so years. Now Pubs will have to run on something else, and Dems...
  6. A

    Fox new's Shepard Smith defends CNN.

    And he did so in an entirely whiny manner. Hence why he was treated poorly by Trump. Seems Shep and you want to completely downplay that part of this. Sorry, I don't.
  7. A

    Wow

    I don't know where to post this, so I chose here. I currently cannot engage in any conversations (PMs) and can't start any new threads. And I no longer have "preview" available for any posts that I write. Plus formatting on all lists of threads, for any forum/sub-forum is wonky. Other than that...
  8. A

    Fox new's Shepard Smith defends CNN.

    CNN (Acosta) acted entirely rudely during the press conference. I thought Trump could've handled it better, but was fairly effective.
  9. A

    The Problem of Misinformation

    All of this is either not true or debatable. But we get it, it's your schtick and you'll not budge from this type of rhetoric. It's become comical, cause this was being said pre-election and how RW media was fooling people and Hillary will win in historical landslide. You'll see that I'm right...
  10. A

    The Problem of Misinformation

    It's interesting how you framed that.
  11. A

    The Problem of Misinformation

    I'm saying bias is unavoidable. It visibly occurs in science, so to think journalism would somehow, magically be devoid of it, is nonsensical. Btw, you lost your point with me at the word "should."
  12. A

    The Problem of Misinformation

    Not the only reason, but that's one of them. I watch or read news outlets that have visible bias I don't align with.
  13. A

    The Problem of Misinformation

    But that's not what you asked me. Also doesn't pertain to what you asked me. You said "in any way, actually align with your personal beliefs." I would think answering no to that would be odd. Like if Fox News reports that President Obama did such and such, that would mean if your answer is...
  14. A

    The Problem of Misinformation

    I'd be very surprised if the same weren't true for you.
  15. A

    The Problem of Misinformation

    But that is your view of what their point/mission is. Anyone can surely play that rhetorical game with any news outlet in history. Define what their point and function is from own perspective. If the news outlet has "mission statement" type documents that contradict that expressed point and...
  16. A

    Homosexuality and Homosexual Marriages: Why do Christians Care?

    I think sexual orientation is chosen if the orientation is something other than bisexual. As a bisexual, I found my own orientation was chosen by reason. While this seems to contradict the first sentence, I find that it is not me that is doing the choosing when it comes to aligning myself with...
  17. A

    Homosexuality and Homosexual Marriages: Why do Christians Care?

    You violated my 17th rule (paragraph 8, sentence 7) for proper internet debate. When you mention many people in a post and I am one of them, but do not specifically address which point applies to me, then you are wrong and there's no nice way to state that. My rules are the nicest way I can...
  18. A

    The Problem of Misinformation

    This doesn't follow from earlier conversation. It's as if you (again) think you have the 'right' information and I'm playing catch up to your point(s). You earlier said: "Not necessarily. I think their [Fox News] journalistic news programs, while not innacruate, are biased in both the stance...
  19. A

    The Problem of Misinformation

    Then you are where I was as an American voter, when I was in my early 20's. Or IOW, when I was naive. People believing in falsehoods, is why we even have a thing as "leader of the country."
  20. A

    The Problem of Misinformation

    That's not accurate assessment of my philosophical position. I believe you failed in the debate to establish an objective reality. If you feel otherwise, we can go outside of the political section to further that debate. The very first sentence of OP attempts to establish such bias, where you...
Top