So you are saying that God cannot be be all three because it’s not moral for God to give us free will to choose and making us accountable for our choices?
It wouldn’t be your fault for you murdering someone because God made you do it by letting you do it? Isn’t that like a parent being charged...
So, let’s get this straight. You objected to what I my claim based on belief that is a claim.
You did NOT indicate that your objection is merely based on your belief. When you failed to do that it does make it appear that you are claiming that your objection is not based on your belief...
How do you figure I failed to realize you said you already did that when I pointed out it’s a my word (a claim of doing that ended with positive results) vs. your word (a claim of doing the same thing that produced negative results) scenario? Your reading comprehension needs work.
Anyhoo, like...
How does you saying you did something proof of anything other than you said something?
This just simply boils to a matter of I said vs. you said and neither of us presented anything other than our word.
So, when it comes to if there is any third party who is interested in finding out if I am...
There are many variables that can come into play here. Especially since history and archeology are continuous works in progress.
Our understanding of ancient cultures are never complete. There will certainly be cultural material that will either be completely destroyed, damaged greatly, or...
Um, that “certainty” is in a belief which means what it is I am certain of you find irrelevant. Otherwise, what would be the point of you saying my certainty is irrelevant to you?
The mere expression of certainty to make a judgement call on makes no sense in of itself. Certainty can be had...
The reason why a question was asked was for you to make clear what your position is and that my assumption was wrong. That is how clarification works.
You could have settled this just by saying either no or yes to what I have concluded, but since you refuse to answer the question it does seem...
How does pointing out that other people are wrong have any bearing on my belief being wrong? That does not make any sense.
Why is my belief irrelevant to you? Just because you assume that other people are wrong? How is that a valid reason?
How is it a strawman argument? Because you said so?
The burden of proof lies with one who claims fact, and that is not what I claimed. I claimed what I believe to be true. What’s ironic is that you claim proof matters but you have no problem choosing to not take the challenge not because...
I am referring to belief in the divinity of Jesus Christ from which teachings include:
6 But without faith it is impossible to please him: for he that cometh to God must believe that he is, and that he is a rewarder of them that diligently seek him.
Hebrews 11:6 KJV
it’s also believed that...
How would such a test verify any God choice if you cannot establish that such a test verifies any God choice? You haven’t presented any evidence to support that conclusion. All you have presented is just an assumption instead of trying it out then put forth your conclusion.
What part of my inquiring how your idea of objective truth is somehow more valid than a truth that’s not been proven currently do you not understand?
Your idea of “not objective truth” doesn’t make any sense as being a valid point. Truth is truth no matter how that truth is revealed.
There is one way to find out to see if there is a God who not only created this world but who also wants us to rely on faith in that God instead of relying on established evidence. That would be to try to act on some faith by learning and applying g what is taught and even seek assurance of...
Where do you get that your idea of objective truth is mire true that a truth that has yet to be proven?
Where are you getting that trying out to the teachings of Christ means to
How is a lack of evidence proving the belief in a God who wants us to rely on faith instead of evidence a valid...
I already explained what the test is. I have been posting what that test is over and over again. The test is to try to find out if you can receive truth about a God by acting on faith in the teachings of that God and praying to that God for verification of truth through receiving actual...
And your proof that that your brain won’t let you be open minded enough to at least try the challenge out as opposed to you just simply choosing to not bother with the challenge is what?