I almost never call people lairs, because lying involves knowing one is being deceptive. So, you are either lying here or confused. You didn't even know how to get one of the studies in the OP(which you made) or the name of it. Obviously, you didn't read it. I had to look for it and I did it...
How? Everything I said was true. You've been arrogantly denying all the subsequent and previous studies not finding anything and the meta-analyses people have linked here. You've only been interested in what Lee Strobel has to say - confirmation bias. And, this has turned into a humorous mocking...
It's quite funny this has turned into a joke thread. It's also quite sad this had to turn into a joke thread. The arrogant denial of other evidence, confirmation bias and mocking element is the sad part
To any and all who read this. I checked the Archives of Internal medicine and William's link from his website to his publications. Here is the first Search Results and the second harris ws - PubMed - NCBI.
This is probably the study from the OP A Randomized, Controlled Trial of the Effects of...
Wrong thread, but errr no. There were a few limitations in the study. I stated some of them in the thread. Look, I didn't perform these studies and they have been reproduced numerous times. If you don't like science, fine. Don't ask me not to not like science.
Yes, that's what I am saying. You didn't even read the open-source ones, but still made comments. So, I try explaining, even though I know you're a troll. Nope. no work. You can't read it nor understand my explanation even tho I copy pasted. Yep, I'll resort to kindergarten tactics. lol