I think you need to get off your spiritual high horse and stop using posioning the well logical fallacies.
For someone who claims to know more about what science is than the general science community, you do not seem well informed of logic
I'm sorry to say that this does not solve the paradox. No amount of weight can be too heavy for a being of infinite strength therefore if the deity was still omnipotent it would be able to lift the rock instantly.
Sorry but that is a false equivalency. This would be like leading a human to a room with an illogical puzzle with an invisible person behind him who will light him on fire if he does not solve the puzzle the way he wants him to. And to top it all of the invisible person made the experiment and...
This seems to me at least to be implying that you beleive there is a mddleground between prayer and non-prayer. I'm just curious as to what that could be as they are mutually exclusive categories as far as I understand them.
I am sorry to say that I do not understand this.
I was raised to believe that the science that made things we like was real science and the science that contradicted the beliefs I was raised in was the work of Satan and not real science.
When I left Christianity and believed in the...
Yet you have no proof that the judeo-christian deity influenced all of the other religions and it fails to address the much more likely answer that it is a simple idea that multiple humans came up with.
And you have yet to prove that the book in question is a valid source.
So you think that giving humans a rorschach test as a system of morals is a good idea?
Also thank you for establishing that you do not understand how meta-analysis works.
I don't have a problem with it and I know a lot of atheists don't. Richard Dawkins said that he says grace if asked to.
That has nothing to do with the title of this thread and needs a separate thread.