Given the nature of what death is and how it is experienced, I already explained why there are no limitations God could put on man toprevent them from separating from God without violating their free will.
What would you have God do?
Force you to stay in relational union with Him against your...
I was saying that the Problem of Evil as I was presenting it is presented as-is, with the premises as-is. If the glove doesn't fit, you don't have to wear it, basically. The PoE is aimed at the god of the philosophers with very general properties; the question then becomes whether any individual...
There are several problems with your argument:
1. Your claim is already refuted on the basis that free will is itself an example of God gifting to man the ability to do something which is unconstrained by any laws which God created to govern the operation of the universe.
Free will by...
There are two problems with that viewpoint:
1. You misunderstood the point I was making:
Which is that if I am giving you logical explanations for how the God of the Bible can be omnipotent, omniscient, and omnibenevolent by referencing Biblical theology, then it would be wrong for you to...
You cannot dispute that God has not chosen to prove that He exists to everyone in the world because that choice is readily apparent, since everyone in the world does not believe in God.
You can dispute my belief that God chose to send Messengers in an effort to communicate to humanity, but...
You seem to be arguing against a position I've never put forward. I know that if an omnipotent exists, it will be capable of doing anything but will only do what it chooses to do. My problem is with what you are telling me your god has chosen to do. It's its choices (along with the total lack of...
You seem to have a recurring problem with not seeing things in posts.
I can explain it again for you in another way:
I pointed out why the premises that underpinned your question were false or baseless.
You tried to argue with it.
You originally tried to argue in support of the premises...
What did I originally try to argue?
You have quoted a question and not an argument.
Perhaps you don't understand this but your claim that I haven't been able to dispute your position isnot going to win you any points on this conversation.
I should have made myself clear from the start: I am...
Your new premise is based on some other unchecked premises that would be false according to the Bible.
New premises:
1. What God wants is the same as what God allows.
2. That God allows things to happen by virtue of not intervening to change it immediately or prevent it from happening in the...
This is how it appears, either heis evil or doesn't exist, unless there is an explanation. And the explanation isnot simple but takes understanding on faith and the veils of light by which God speaks through. It's not simple at all as an explanation.
If an omnipotent entity that could prevent suffering chooses notto because it wants to stay hidden, I would describe that entity as evil, Certainly not omnibenevolent.
The Father isOmnipotent. As he created the universe and is outside time and space, His Divinity isnot knowable. To avoid taking away from His Glory, Heis All Powerful. Heis All Knowing. Heis All Loving.
God can create anything except the impossible. In a universe of free willing...
Godis certainly omnipotent butGod wants us to fight the evil. By doing so we become what we were born to be. Not a weak God and doesn't like weakness. Pities it but prefers us to be strong in good. This is why he allows evil to reign. If people believe Jesus isGod manifest then that should...
Playing catsup is fine as long as we don't spread ourselves thin on french fries (or other foods).
The butterfly effect means that if we prevent suffering, that might have further ramifications. The total amount of suffering might be a result of over-population.
A population could be limited...
I'm not sure I'd necessarily make that assumption.
Plenty of the theists who believe in the sort of godto which the Problem of Evil applies also believe - as a tenet of their faith - that their godnot only has the ability to create a world with no suffering whatsoever where free will is...
Only one instance of suffering to make a contradiction with omnibenevolence? I am not going down that all or nothing road, sorry. It istoo illogical. Besides, I never said I believe that Godis omnibenevolent. I only believe that Godis benevolent, because that is what Baha'u'llah wrote:
“Be...
Okay, thanks for explaining that admittedly, I had not see that so I was unaware of your position on free will.
As I said on the other thread, As long as physical bodies exist there will be physical suffering. There isnot some other kind of physical body God could create that would not be...
Logically, there are things an otherwise omnipotent being can't do. For example [he] can't occupy the same reality as another omnipotent being; hence [he] can't make a perfect copy of [him]self.
Of course if you're omnipotent, perhaps logical restrictions don't apply to you, and you can do...
Actually, it isn’t "heaven on earth", but rather the restoration of paradise on earth...where God intended humans to live in the first place. "Paradise" means a park-like garden.....it was God who created the blueprint for what he wanted the whole earth to look like. He encouraged them to "be...