For most of us...shoes are NECESSARY to substantially prevent injury .Including things such as frost bite in which can lead to having to have our feet amputated..lacerations..infections etc....
The accounts of men who were not circumcised who later as adults had themselves circumcised are very telling.Yes loss of sensitivity is reported.
So instead of just looking for statistics I take the men's word for it who experience it.
Exactly and do we get to count the rate of complications that can happen later in life?Like circumcision being linked to higher instances of erectile dysfunction?
How many adult males would need to come forward ..the ones who are LIVING with negative affects of circumcision to admit its was...
Im just even further convicted listening to some of those men's stories.Its heartbreaking.It doesn't sound like its too good for women either.Including the foreskin apparently aids in lubrication during sex..but hey ...that's what we have Astroglide and Ky for.
Because wisdom teeth serve no function other than causing issues.
I think whats avoided in these debates is some of the FUNCTIONS the foreskin serves which is not debated..And only what kinds of POTENTIAL problems can arise.
What is lost for some men because of it is completely ignored.
Also if you look it up...you will find plenty of stories of men who resent being circumsized as infants...as well as before and after stories of men who got circumsized as adults who regret it mostly due to loss of sensitivity.The foreskin(for one) acts as a barrier to protect the glans from...
But boys don't cry at all ..or just a little bit when you slice off the skin of their penis..it barely hurts at all...not like shot..and it doesn't hurt at all to have a bleeding scabbed over penis for the next week or so being exposed to urine and feces every day and rubbing up against a...
That was to TREAT an injury not inflict an injury.Foreskin is not an injury that needs to be treated like a foreign object stuck in your foot.Removal of the foreskin IS the injury.
Well I have.
That does NOT mean they are not still in pain.And my babies cried..Its ridiculous to suggest with...
Immunizations have virtually eradicated many deadly and crippling diseases ...and you are talking about a needle stick and quick recovery ...not slicing off a body part of an extremely sensitive organ .. and altering permanently an organ ..I wouldn't compare the pain involved..let alone the...
Or how about when my infant son's skin(what they left) adhered (started growing attaching to the glans)...and they had to rip it back causing extreme pain..he cried until he passed out..I think he was at around 2 weeks old..the pain and swelling went on for another 2 weeks before it was healed...
And as far as the risk of STD's as has been mentioned we are talking infants.At an appropriate age you then would educate the child/adolescent.I think removing a body part of an infant ..just in case one day they decide to have unsafe sex with a person who has an STD is *** backwards.
I think that is the point.How would you know you have less sensitivity without your foreskin if you have never experienced sex with foreskin in tact?
Also the foreskin serves other functions.Its as if its treated as a useless body part that is only there to pose some future risk.Like a wisdom...
Oh and by the way for that matter..WHY not go ahead and chop off ear lobes at birth..its a useless piece of skin...snip off all the useless skin ...Why just pick on foreskin?
Just get rid of it its useless...