No, we can't. This is one big agenda that they're trying to get done. It's fine to say "well, this part isn't bad", but we're talking about an agenda as a whole. You either support it or you don't. So, you either think there's enough good stuff to outweigh all that extremely bad stuff, or you...
That's exactly what it said. If you can't read between the lines, it would be best to let others help you with it.
No, I haven't. Please stop. This is silly. What we're talking about is an entire agenda. You're trying to break it down and parse it, as if it makes sense to judge each individual...
Not every one, no, but this seems a reasonable one in which to intervene.
Yes, they are. They invaded the eastern parts because they're east of Ukraine. Their goal is to get to Kyiv.
Yes, they are. That was the whole point. Putin didn't like them wanting to join NATO, so he instigated this...
No, you didn't. All you did was say you don't believe Russia wants to control all of Ukraine. For one, they're invading all of Ukraine, not just part of it. For another, they're doing it to stop Ukraine from joining NATO, which is an attempt to control Ukraine, not just part of it. And then you...
I don't need anyone there for me in retirement, and I'm not worried about anyone dropping me, because I'm the greatest, most awesomest, coolest, most tremendous country God ever created. I don't think this kind of mindset has ever worked out badly for anyone else in history, especially not that...
No, it doesn't.
There's that "godless" thing again. I also like that you think "globalist" is somehow an insult. But yeah, Kiev has become just a normal place, not the anti-Christ Putin wants you to believe it is.
You say that as if it makes it any better. Ukraine is a sovereign country. Russia has no claim to any of its land. "Even though at one point Ukraine was part of Russia" is just more pro-Russia defense.
Yeah, gee, I wonder why. Couldn't be because THEY WERE WORRIED ABOUT GETTING INVADED JUST...
That's great. Now, what in Project 2025 do you see that outweighs those things I mentioned.
"Claims like mine"? You mean, pointing out the stuff that's in Project 2025? You're welcome to read it, but you'll be disappointed to find out that these aren't "claims", they're stuff in the agenda.
Mostly because it's very vague, but also because it's basically saying we should only cultivate relationships with other countries that give us a big enough "return on investment", meaning "let's stop helping countries like Ukraine".
Again, stop saying this. No one has said an idea is good or...
No, the war was brought on because Russia instigated it and wants to control Ukraine.
Right, you are blaming the victim. The only way to avoid war was to promise not to join NATO and to give up part of their country to Russia. That's not "unwise". It just means they wouldn't give in to Putin's...
The U.S. and west will avoid it because of the risk of world war. Of course there's a risk anyway, but at a certain point, you have to take the risk. Otherwise, you'd just let Putin do whatever he wants.
NATO is the "creature" of the 12 founding countries. NATO is not interested in "world hegemony", and they're not concerned with a "competitor". They're an alliance of nations that offers protection to all members. That's it. The rest is just your deep bias.
They were wise enough not to give...
But most of us don't listen to Putin because we know that nothing he says is trustworthy, especially when he uses phrases like "caveman-like Russophobia". Considering your country is still supporting Ukraine, I'd say most of the country is in fact not buying into your conspiracy theories.
Which good things do you think outweigh the effort to end abortion, including abortion drugs, remake the government to the point that Trump could appoint civil servants at all levels who will be loyal to him, giving him enough control to overturn an election (the control he lacked the last time...