No, I'm saying your compatriots don't buy into your conspiracy theories about "the elites" and America forcing other countries to fight Russia and such.
Um, what?
Biden's withdrawal speaks volumes about the fact that he is too old and not in a good position to win the election. It speaks nothing about anything else.
Yes, because Putin and Russia did a horrible thing they shouldn't have. And yet you're defending them and blaming Ukraine. The same as blaming a rape victim. "Well, she chose to wear that revealing outfit. Of course the guy was going to rape her."
NATO's purpose is to protect member countries against aggression, mainly from Russia, but others too. Their purpose is not at all to perpetuate American hegemony. That's a very odd claim considering America is only one of dozens of countries involved.
Ukraine is not a tool for them. Ukraine...
Correct. I'll admit I might have a slight bias, but that doesn't change the fact that I'm basing things on the facts of the situation, not an affinity for Putin.
I'm not even sure what this is supposed to mean.
But there aren't any good ideas, only some not-that-bad ones. This isn't a case of "not feeding hungry children", and it's not a case of opposing something because of who said it. It's a case of an agenda that includes many things.
And you either support Project 2025, or you reject it. You can...
Charitably, it could have meant that he'd fix all the problems plaguing the country in his next term, so they wouldn't have to worry about any of it after that. Obviously, that's an insane claim, but technically it's possible from how he said it.
But, of course, considering the context of all...
It doesn't make sense because certain issues shouldn't be left to states. Human rights issues should be handled federally.
Considering your clear support for the right and its talking points, I'd be very interested to see which test said you lean to the left and why.
But since the bad parts are extremely bad and the largest part of it, they heavily outweigh any potential "not bad" parts.
It's a myth that Mussolini "made the trains run on time", but even if it was true, him doing that one thing that was actually good doesn't come close to equaling, much less...
It doesn't mention that. This is what it says:
Working fathers are essential to the well-being and development of their
children, but the United States is experiencing a crisis of fatherlessness that is
ruining our children’s futures. In the overwhelming number of cases, fathers
insulate...
Maybe some is, but it's not a good sign when you have to hedge with "nothing in the whole thing is based on reality"? The important sections either lack connection to reality or try to subvert democracy, or both.
To be clear, it is anti-LGBTQ+. "The LGBTQ+ agenda" is just to promote an end to...
Because it's a far right agenda that lacks a connection with reality.
It's possible there are a few things in there that aren't completely ridiculous, but that matters little when there is so much that is completely ridiculous.
Because it promotes the idea of "a family with a married father...
Sure, just like you can benefit from living in peace, as opposed to dying trying to save your wife from the intruder who took her. Just let him have her, and you can live in peace!
"Living in peace" is meaningless if the "peace" is just giving the person attacking you what they want.