You wrote "technically, ESP is considered as being one of our senses, regardless of it being actually true or not."
I asked by whom - that is WHO considers ESP to be one of our senses?
Name a person that considers ESP to be one of our senses, please.
Your creationist handlers keep lying to you.
Well, have at is, superstar:
I forget now who originally posted these on this forum*, but I keep it in my archives because it offers a nice 'linear' progression of testing a methodology and then applying it:
The tested methodology:
Science 25...
Interesting. Many earlier studies show the same.
Funny - it seems that you completely missed the point of the study - not surprising. The analysis was NOT to gauge the % similarity between humans and chimps comparing the entire genome of each. Admittedly, the title is misleading, but one...
Pretty pathetic - relies on Tomkins, conflates disparate issues, engages in dopey analogies as evidence. And he claims not to have an agenda or be a creationist, so dishonest, too.
Stopped taking this post seriously right there...
What are the presuppositions of actual science?
Creation/ID "science" has a presupposition that is in direct contradiction to the very nature of science.
But you know that...
You're either very ignorant and behind the times or just a ... um...
I don't have a religion. Why would you try to force one upon me?
One that does religion.
Ah, so you've sold all of your possessions and given all to the poor, as Jesus wanted?
Or are you one of those 'Murkin Christians that thinks all that 'help the poor' crap only pertained to the Hebrews?
Hard to tell, my apologies.
In your preferred story of creation, your Deity of choice made a male first, then paraded all of the beasts that He had also created (apparently, male and female) from which this man could choose "an helpmeet".
It was only after Adam didn't find an helpmeet that...
Concession accepted. Maybe from now on don't make such stupid assertions?
What does that even mean?
Not sure why you think I should answer with facts when all you ever do is wrote bare assertions devoid of any facts at all why do you think you should get a pass?
Why do I think there are...
You never answered, you asked ME if those were claimed to be 'good things',
Boring...
You have a hard time keeping things straight, so let me cast some pearls before swine...then I see no reason to continue - you make assertions that you 'support' with more assertions. Standard religious...
I'd prefer that she support her own assertions rather than hide behind someone else.
I do not accept Strong's as relevant. I've seen many debunkings/warnings about using his works - from biblical literalists.
I guess you are out of luck and will have to come up with actual evidence.
Non sequiturs are amazing.
Where are your pubs on how human DNA is "biologically different" to other animals?
You claim human DNA is biologically different from non-humans.
Please identify which of these 3 sequences is from a human:
If you cannot do so, please retract that nonsensical...
TRANSLATION:
I cannot provide sufficient evidence to change the minds of those that do not blindly accept religious tales at face value that these tales are totally true.
Thus, I will just preach to the choir to gain some witnessing points to make myself feel special.