And thanks again that you cannot define it in a biologically-relevant way - by the way, writing essentially the same thing over and over will not make it true, sorry.
*Edited by staff*
YOU: The Bible is Reliable and tested...
ME: Then surely you provide links to these tests?
YOU: Was this a good thing?
Hilarious - apologetics in action.
You're the one that thinks objectives observations are not objective.
But I commend you for unwittingly acknowledging that you just demolished one of the key excuses religionists typically provide for accepting bible lore uncritically - that it contains objective truths.
You simply cannot accept that you cannot answer a simple question, for to do so would expose your ignorance on even trivial issues.
If you weren't so busy propping up your flimsy ego you might realize that you have been making a complete fool of yourself on public forums for YEARS because you...
Why?
Is this the level of your ignorance re: development and genetic change's influence on morphology?
Are you really THIS naïve and uninformed?
I mean, I knew you were all along, but rarely do you come out and confirm my hypothesis.
Tell me, brain genius, is this really what you think...