• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Search results

  1. N

    ‘Free will’ is not an excuse for God allowing atrocities.

    It is controlling you if he was indeed the creator. It's exactly the same as being preprogrammed, it's an extreme version of it.
  2. N

    ‘Free will’ is not an excuse for God allowing atrocities.

    Who says we are not robots or robots are not us? A lot of people always bring up robots and compare them to humans when talking about the lack of free will, but it's not even an equivalent comparison. I think the reason why they use robots as an example is because they are confusing robots with...
  3. N

    If God existed would there be proof?

    Or you simply just have something that was always there.
  4. N

    If God existed would there be proof?

    And my definition of "proof" here is exactly the same one you're using that you posted in here.
  5. N

    Does evolution have a purpose?

    Nobody is bullying you into taking a stance because you've already taken a stance on the subject prior to you engaging in this conversation. And that is the truth whether you deny it or not. Through observations, I would have to agree with you on this. You do form your own opinions, even if...
  6. N

    Does evolution have a purpose?

    The evidence below clearly shows what's actually true, that your conclusion is that you are strongly convinced of one particular position. One does not need to be a scientist to observe what you have said. Sorry, but your feelings have no bearing on what the truth is. Majority of the time, the...
  7. N

    Does evolution have a purpose?

    Ultimately, you are rejecting the truth based on whether or not it makes you feel good/satisfaction. You rejected the truth and responded with the above in order to satisfy your own feelings. If you would've accepted the truth, then you wouldn't have the need to omit parts of the things that I...
  8. N

    Does evolution have a purpose?

    I'm not sure exactly what you're asking because you can only gain more knowledge if that knowledge is not those in which you currently possessed. You weren't living hundreds of years ago either, so why did you decide to gain more knowledge about the Quran, a book written hundreds of years...
  9. N

    The new Athiest Humanities downfall?

    It amazes me how a lot of nonatheists always want to define what atheism/atheists are instead of letting the atheists define what atheism is and who atheists are.
  10. N

    Atheists Will go to Heaven?

    According to the bible, no particular prequisite is necessary for one to enter heaven. Christ is the one who ultimately decides who can enter heaven.
  11. N

    Does evolution have a purpose?

    Why would you ask that question if you're a Muslim? One of the fundamental teachings of Islam is the quest for knowledge. Why wouldn't you want to gain more knowledge?
  12. N

    How do you define evolution?

    Actually, you're wrong. A sheep doesn't remain a sheep and a goat doesn't remain a goat when a ram and a doe interbreed and produces an offspring that is still fertile. Don't forget, the bible strictly differentiate the SHEEP KIND from the GOAT KIND. And sorry, but trying to use the excuse...
  13. N

    Pascals' Wager Reloaded 3 (Matrix 3rd movie kidding)

    I agree that you that truth is worth seeking, but that's not what Pascal's Wager proposed. What it actually propose is to accept something that's not known to be true and stop there. Basically it's telling you to stop seeking the truth and just take the risk to accept something that you don't...
  14. N

    The first cause argument

    Since I did not make that proposition, it's a whole other thing then.
  15. N

    How do you define evolution?

    Of course that doesn't prove it because that's not how evolution works. The development of a human fetus to adulthood is not what the Theory of Evolution theorized. Only those who are opposed to the theory and are ignorant of it, would make that objection thinking that it's the nail in the...
  16. N

    The first cause argument

    Are you capable of defending your argument without dodging other people's objections and/or using a strawman? You claim to know that god exist and is hiding even though you have no way of accessing him in any way. Why ask me those questions, you're the who believes that god exist, not me...
  17. N

    The first cause argument

    Tell that to the one who believes that we are the ones who determines time in a particular frame of reference.
  18. N

    Atheists: What would be evidence of God’s existence?

    Illogical. This is the special pleading fallacy. You said it yourself that they both have the same problem and yet, there's an exception for determining if the messenger is telling the truth. Then why wouldn't god just speak to humans directly so that they can understand him without the...
  19. N

    The first cause argument

    So you're saying that you can make sense of the hidden reality that you have no access, meaning that you cannot know of its existence, yet you know that that hidden reality is hidden. Why didn't you say that earlier, it all makes sense now. :rolleyes: So basically you're implying that you're...
  20. N

    The first cause argument

    Sure, you don't have to, but you do accept things that makes no sense to you, hence your comment below. ;) You accept a mysterious reality that's hidden from you, one that you can make no sense of. So like I said, you don't have to accept things that don't make sense to you, but you do accept...
Top