In what way(s) are the relevant laws for people's benefit? I identify as queer and polysexual. If I was a Baha'i, how would I benefit from the Baha'i laws on homosexuality?
And this loving God condemns homosexual sexual activity in such strong terms that it is more than likely that a committed Baha'i engaging in homosexual sexual activity will feel deeply ashamed and distressed and may quite possibly become depressed as a result? Suggests a God that doesn't have...
So no specific data for your claim as to men not sticking around outside of marriage.
As to comparing a committed, stable relationship to a car accident...
Thanks for taking the time to post the refs.
But most of this seems to be about those who aren't in committed, stable relationships with their partners and any associated offspring. It is perfectly possible to be in a committed, stable relationship without being married.
You said that you consider that if a religion has faults they have been introduced by man. That suggests that you think some religions at least do have faults.
I asked whether that makes you the arbiter as to those religions/their faults.
If God has a strong dislike for something and makes somebody feel shameful for doing that something, and it is against Baha'i laws, that is bound to make them feel very bad/depressed, and is also bound to rub off on others who might shun them or treat them differently despite other teachings...