• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Search results

  1. J

    Can religion reject this science ?

    I'll start with this and the so what . A mono-pole point charge distributed over a volume of space with a ? measure, will cause the density of the charge to decrease to a point of no negligible existence , popped into and out of existence . Try to understand this bit first please , can you...
  2. J

    Can religion reject this science ?

    Maybe ! You say I can use hf to represent a point charge ? What would you use for an unspecified volume of space ? Please help me . If S = xyzE Then hf / S seems correct? How about hf / V^n where V is volume and n is unspecified ?
  3. J

    Can religion reject this science ?

    That's interesting , a different moderator on another forum who does maths said that was correct .
  4. J

    Can religion reject this science ?

    It's not meaningless and the kE max of an entropy/system is hf / S
  5. J

    Can religion reject this science ?

    Well , I've used hf before and guess what ? They said that was wrong also . I did get Kmax = hf / S correct ... Δp Δx = <E
  6. J

    Can religion reject this science ?

    Did you even read what I wrote ? Obviously not ! My formula explains the process in a form different than words . I describe the physics involved in the process using the appropriate symbols . Try a question . Please describe in math a point energy distributing to surrounding points ?
  7. J

    Can religion reject this science ?

    It's only gibberish to you because like I don't understand some of your maths because I've not learn't it , the same applies to you . Can we start fresh ? My formula explains the process in a form different than words . I describe the physics involved in the process using the appropriate...
  8. J

    Can religion reject this science ?

    I've heard of kE obviously , however that is also a invalid argument . Speed is not required for energy , have you ever heard of zero point energy ? E = A + B / t Which is stating E= m/t no c required mE³ / R^n = delta t
  9. J

    Can religion reject this science ?

    Mass times a speed squared is energy ? No way ! That makes no sense . Why would a speed be needed for energy ? It wouldn't ....
  10. J

    Can religion reject this science ?

    Anyway , I give up ! Trying to educate zombie robots is futile .
  11. J

    Can religion reject this science ?

    Well this thread is science mainly , some science is very made up !
  12. J

    Is it OK to sing the N word?

    Words and word use are subjective , I believe the word ****** has a past . Where does the word come from ? Could it be slang for a person who originated from Nigeria ? A Brit is from Britain A Yank is from America A rusky is from Russia .... A Paki is from Pakistan A ****** could well...
  13. J

    Can religion reject this science ?

    Actually the arrogance is of science ! For over a decade I've been pointing out errors they ignore . Mistakes I have corrected for them . P.s My diagrams are spot on .....my notions are spot on ...
  14. J

    Can religion reject this science ?

    I've asked for math help and people had no idea , they said they can do maths but they can't really . I created my own that works for my theory , what is the problem with that ? 1 / >1 = <1 It works doesn't it ?
  15. J

    Can religion reject this science ?

    I'll be taken more seriously if I ignore all the errors of present science , stop trying to present advanced science and just learn to repeat present information like some parrot ? What a curious and strange world ! Have you not considered it is you that just simply doesn't understand my...
  16. J

    Can religion reject this science ?

    No mc² is not energy because mass * speed is momentum , you already told me and c is a speed , so mass times speed squared makes no sense what so ever . E = (-Q) + (+Q) / t no speed required or needed . The energy is proportional to its mass xyzE
  17. J

    Can religion reject this science ?

    So you are agreeing that mc² is not energy ? Because c is a speed .....
  18. J

    Can religion reject this science ?

    I was saving some of this stuff for book two , my special theory ''stuff'' . An object will remain in motion because of the force pulling on it . Remember my spaceship design ? Your spaceship designers are rather hopeless when considering space travel .....
  19. J

    Can religion reject this science ?

    Mass objects curves field mass N><N = N<>N Thats just a G thing ..... F<E = P where P is momentum Newton stuff.....advanced... 1E³ is centripetal pull ......hint it curves space-time energy inwards... Einstein advanced Think about my theory wrote so far .... Newton - absolute space...
  20. J

    Can religion reject this science ?

    People are so clueless ! How big is one ? It can be infinitesimally small or any value to infinite ....... 1 / >1 = 0 think I can't put 1 / ∞ = 0 1E³ says 1 times energy cubed , can't you read math ? How about if I wrote it mE³ would you understand that ? Because mc² is pointless...
Top