• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Search results

  1. J

    Can religion reject this science ?

    I'm trying so hard to get you to understand . I've done an edit for anyone interested ! 2. Micro bang theory ( Virtual particles popping into and out of existence ). We've already discussed the absolute of space and in a sense , space is an infinite volume of nothingness that has always...
  2. J

    Can religion reject this science ?

    Sorry for posting again but I have to share this diagram with you ...:p
  3. J

    Can religion reject this science ?

    It's difficult to explain but it brief Q- and Q+ manifest simultaneous at the exact same point , ZPE . This point then self inflates to form a hollow sphere with a dense interwoven shell , a field interior and a field exterior . 6 on my contents , not written yet .
  4. J

    Can religion reject this science ?

    Electrostatic energy , Q- + Q+ = 1N 1N is one electrical neutral energy particle . Perhaps it will help you understand if I show you my revised version of an atom . I have a typo on the diagram, please ignore.
  5. J

    Can religion reject this science ?

    I can ''see'' physics ... (F(G) = F(g)) = 4/3 pi r³
  6. J

    Can religion reject this science ?

    It's pointless or you don't really understand it yet properly ? Try this diagram ...I'm so far ahead of physics they don't understand ..............
  7. J

    Can religion reject this science ?

  8. J

    Can religion reject this science ?

    No it isn't , you do realise that 1E³ is 1 * E³ ?
  9. J

    Can religion reject this science ?

    Anyone who knows science knows that E generally represent energy . Any one know maths that 0.5 + 0.5 = 1. Pfff.........
  10. J

    Can religion reject this science ?

    I've now started 3 of my contents . 3. Binary energy particle ( A quantum singularity ) In the previous section , we discussed Micro Bangs in which was demonstrated , a mono-pole point charge manifestation has no mechanism to retain form or density, in an infinite volume of lesser energy...
  11. J

    Can religion reject this science ?

    It's not difficult to understand ...1E³ which is (Q-) + (Q+) / t * (Q- / k) / t + *(Q+ / k) / t= >4/3 pi r ³ / t Consider , everything you observe is in the interior of an expanding atom , micro atoms exist within the interior of the expanding atom .
  12. J

    Can religion reject this science ?

    Yes it does , an electron and a proton add up to 1 atom. 1E³ then is an expansion of 1 . Don't forget in the laws of charge , a neg or pos charge is attracted to neutral charge . (Q-) + (Q+) = Neutral charge (N) also
  13. J

    Can religion reject this science ?

    4. Binary energy particle expansion ( Singularity expansion) 4 in brief , all the pre-existing micro bang energy is attracted centripetally and isotropically to 3. Binary energy particle ( A quantum singularity ) causing it to expand . 5. The n-field theory (The interior field matter of a...
  14. J

    Can religion reject this science ?

    We'll see , Polymath is getting to grips with it , it is advanced , harder than relativity to understand .
  15. J

    Can religion reject this science ?

    That's exactly what it suppose to mean so thank you for accepting my ''pass'' math . Q- / k = 0 is popping into and out of existence . Time does not begin until section 3 of my theory . Let me explain in brief , section 3 , at any random point of k , Q- and Q+ manifested...
  16. J

    Can religion reject this science ?

    I re-quote the above from you ! Can I use that line in my theory ? 1) Q- / k = 0 to express a negative charged mono-pole divided by the lesser energy state of absolute space , annihilated out of negligible existence 2) Q+ / k = 0 to express a positive charged mono-pole divided by lesser energy...
  17. J

    Can religion reject this science ?

    Ok , I appreciate your opinion . You say there is no actual math, yet you said earlier you use Q for charge . You then understood Q- / k = 0 but you now say there is no actual maths ? If you understood it the math must be valid ?
  18. J

    Can religion reject this science ?

    I've not wrote 3 and 4 yet , Contents: 1. Absolute Newtonian space 2. Micro bang theory ( Virtual particles popping into and out of existence ). 3. Binary energy particle ( A quantum singularity ) 4. Binary energy particle expansion ( Singularity expansion) 5. The n-field theory (The interior...
  19. J

    Can religion reject this science ?

    I've to pop put for a while , I feel you are very close to understanding me . Q- / k = 0 and Q+ / k = 0 When Q- and Q+ combine to become a singularity , Q- / k and Q+/ k pop back into existence to expand (Q-) + (Q+) / t Space-time begins ! The first gravitational mass is formed...
  20. J

    Can religion reject this science ?

    This ...
Top