• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Search results

  1. paradox

    A rephrasing of the cosmological argument.

    You do know that BB is a theory rather than proof? The biggest problem with BB is "infinitely dense mass", if you watch my video you'll see that "infinity does not provide legitimate basis for rational thought"
  2. paradox

    A rephrasing of the cosmological argument.

    Nice work indeed! Did you watch following video already? I find it related and might help refine or shorten your argument:
  3. paradox

    The world through your eyes.

    I can't believe you stole my eyes. btw. I liked your post before I even finished reading it, you got me already on first sentence.
  4. paradox

    Library Idiocy

    When you're given a logical argument such as contradiction then you're supposed to logically refute it and prove it's not contradition. I'm sorry but "running you mouth" is not a logical argument.
  5. paradox

    Library Idiocy

    Haha, you've been shown the mistake you made and still insist you didn't. **mod edit**
  6. paradox

    Library Idiocy

    Because: 1.) I'm unable to find APA definition of "sociopathic personality disturbance" to verify it's not mental disorder. 2.) You differentiate the two but APA dictionary does not seem to. 3.) There is no way in verifying you are what you said you are - a psychology major. even though it seems...
  7. paradox

    Library Idiocy

    OK man I apologize for my silly mistake (which I already corrected), but you really do not need to admit your mistake shown in post #274. (there is no need) btw. there is a saying which says:
  8. paradox

    Library Idiocy

    Didn't you made a bad mistake by saying (note bold part) But now you catch yourself lying: Let's not play word catching game because obviously nobody is robot, it was misunderstanding and that's how I interpret it and said "OK then". Do you want me to officially apologize?
  9. paradox

    Library Idiocy

    How is that APA does not define "sociopathic personality disturbance" but only "antisocial personality disorder" but you differentiate the two? Can you please provide reliable source that defines "sociopathic personality disturbance"? Wasn't homosexuality defined as sexual deviance in DSM-2...
  10. paradox

    A frustration

    I see, conspiracies are all about intentional misinformation, therefore no surprise.
  11. paradox

    ...and now for something completely different: Free Will!

    All of this is what YOU said not me. If you don't believe me go look post history and you'll see. :) Answer to the question with logic since you claimed logic is "god" No I didn't say it "could" provide an answer, I said that it should give you an answer since you said logic is "god"
  12. paradox

    Library Idiocy

    I suppose you didn't read the whole thread because otherwise you would not say that. I did say that homosexuality was removed from DSM and stopped to be "Sociopathic Personality Disturbance", and this whole debate is around motives for being removed and whether it was justified in regard to...
  13. paradox

    Library Idiocy

    OK then, but the fact is that the book was banned several times. See also: Banned & Challenged Classics | Advocacy, Legislation & Issues (ala.org) Anyway, in regard to OP issue is that people should decide them self what to read, books must not be banned.
  14. paradox

    Library Idiocy

    Nice to have you, I hope you're not biased in your profession. You sound like this is ideological matter (with which I may agree) but what about the rest of the civilized world?
  15. paradox

    Library Idiocy

    haha, that's exactly what the "brave new world" book talks about. It all starts nice in the name of "Community, Identity, Stability" but this then leads to disaster, complete opposite of what's it's supposed to be. Not because democracy is false but simply because it can't solve all the problems...
  16. paradox

    ...and now for something completely different: Free Will!

    I'm familiar with logic which you claimed to be "god" But judging by your posts it is you who is not familiar with god of another's person position? Definitions of God - PHILOSOPHY DUNGEON (weebly.com) You first.
  17. paradox

    Library Idiocy

    It's not so much about ideals as it is about dangers that may come out of utopian-style ideology. I suppose you didn't read summary of the book from my link? In summary utopia leads to dystopia. Did I not quote wikipeida?
  18. paradox

    Library Idiocy

    Brave New World - Wikipedia
  19. paradox

    Library Idiocy

    Your vision of democracy sounds like "brave new world", which is extremely dangerous ideology for "collective well-being" 'Brave New World,' Plato's 'Republic,' and Our Scientific Regime (thenewatlantis.com) btw. please keep in mind that the American Library Association has banned this book...
  20. paradox

    Viruses of the Mind

    They are manipulated without realizing that being manipulated. Faiths are designed so that questioning their integrity is considered loss of faith, this produces a complexity which doesn't allow you to think rationally. For example I asked one priest a complex question, he gave me an answer...
Top