1. Cars are designed by humans and require an operator, either a human, or a pre-existing set of instructions(like an "AI".)
2. Evolution wasn't designed by humans, and doesn't require an operator.
3. No paths are random, even for an out-of-control car. It'll move according to all the pathways...
No one is proposing it as an idea over 100 years after Darwin's death. He might have. But the evidence supports that conclusion, so tough titty i suppose. Anyway, your bible starts with a "proposed idea." What's wrong with it?
I already posted in that thread and you had no idea how to respond...
Yours.
natural selection
Last i checked, natural selection is a part of evolution.
Not to mention you used the word "evolution."
In case it wasn't clear: You made a terrible analogy of evolution and cars. I responded to that. You seem confused. You're asking "who's talking about...
That's picking and choosing. How do you explain this: The 10 commandments are from those same times.
I'll try to guess it: You condemn some things in the bible, while propping up others, then make the conclusion that the bible is infallible. How close did i get?
Okay.
No, i didn't realize. Can you list all of those things instead of just claiming it? What's with the leading questions?
Wait a second. In another thread you claimed that you read through an evolution 101 yet here you're still conflating proof with evidence. But for the record: There's...
I didn't say that. I'm saying you're thinking there's a leap, but you have failed to demonstrate it in any way. I am quite aware of the difference between a chimp's and a human's ability to think, but i made no claims regarding it any way.
Here's MY claim: Chimps can do OTHER things better than...
1. Cars are designed by humans and require an operator, either a human, or a pre-existing set of instructions(like an "AI".)
2. Evolution wasn't designed by humans, and doesn't require an operator.
3. No paths are random, even for an out-of-control car. It'll move according to all the pathways...
I suppose you might think this is a convincing argument. If so:
You are listing things which humans are better at than other animals. More correctly: You listed one thing but divided it into multiple points. It's our ability to think. Specifically to think outside the box.
We cannot fly. Birds...
Counterpoint: You are an evil last thursdayist who's advocating for a deceiver god planting false evidence. Prove me wrong.
If you won't, i won't even bother reading your response.
If you don't think other planets are verified to exist, then you can't even safely assume Mars exists, let alone assume a bunch of variables and features attached to it, and then use these variables as reasoning for Earth being flat. You're getting ahead of yourself there.
This has got to be...
"Blablabla."
The important part was that you said that there "is no supporting evidence for the theory of evolution." This is a lie. You're literally making the claim that there are no evidences for it whatsoever. That's a lie. This thread is some of that evidence, you're in it.
I didn't miss you perpetuate this lie.
Ah, your typical argumentation method. I guess you do it often enough for it to have lost its impact for you. Well, it still feels like you running away.
So, you also failed the part where you're supposed to defend your religion with the best of effort...
None of those are history books. They are Christian apologetics. They are trying to argue, using philosophical terms, the necessity for the truth value regarding those peoples' own beliefs. That's all.
None of those books are evidence of anything except people having an emotional attachment to...
If Jesus was historical, it's up to you to show, with evidence, that he experienced crucifixion or resurrection.
But your claims aren't of "historical Jesus" but 100% biblical Jesus. You literally keep using the bible to support your stuff. You would use a history book(and no, the bible isn't a...
I think you're putting the cart before the horse. I don't think you've shown there were women at the tomb, or even who those women were. You're just repeating an ancient claim. You haven't even shown that there were disciples, or that there was a grave, or even that Jesus died, let alone lived...
*grabs popcorn*
A Baha'i trying to teach a Born Again Christian about Jesus. I bet neither of you see the hypocrisy in that endeavor. You're both essentially telling each other your beliefs are wrong.
That being said, i do agree with the statements that it should be about his teachings, not...