Oh, no, that's definitely not the coat of arms for Saint-Barthélemy
That's from an old seal from 1217, the Arms of Champagne, and later the crest of Troyes, France
You might already be familiar with Troyes if you have an interest in religious topics
That's right
So then if you are going to derive Pi in base 10 and assign rank to them using the natural numbers, where do the terms
165,166,167,168
put you in Pi ?
And while you are thinking about that, think about this
Where does the convention of 86,400 seconds to a day come from, and...
Well,looks like nobody got it
Trust me, the responses I'm seeing are the usual
They come from people with no training in math, mathematical astronomy in Mesopotamia, ancient languages, etc, so it's not uncommon to see them
Now I'm going to continue
Using standard gematria
Why ?
Because the three base set itself is based on knowledge of the repunit set
{ 111,222,333,444,555,666,777,888,999 }
and their locations in Pi
" repunit " or " repdigit " is a term like 666 that has repeating digits { there are several notations used, but they...
In the meantime, here's a fun little mathematical puzzle for you that is related to the answer of the question asked in the last post
What are the only four consecutive three digit terms on the number line that when added will sum to 666 ?
This is a simple summation, it should be easy
It's...
Right, so this is not obvious until we bring the natural numbers into the discussion
N = { 1, 2, 3, 4, ...}
If we were going to assign a rank number to each digit in Pi, we'd use the natural numbers
Now for a person who knows math, this is rather trivial, but let me explain for the people who...
Btw, my friend, if you are interested in Newton's " occult " studies { a word itself having etymology deriving from astronomy terminology - occultation }, I would merely suggest you try starting with a source like Wikipedia, and the article on " Newton's occult studies "
Here is the link for...
It's OK, just breath, we'll get to it
The mathematical value of the first verse of the Bible found in Pi is significant
It's not significant for the fact it's found in the digits of Pi { as I explained }
It's significant because of where it is:
Here's the first 500 digits of Pi in base 10...
No, actually Newton spent a majority of his time studying the Assyrian-Babylonian gematria in the Bible looking for ways to accurately predict the day " Jesus " would show up
In fact, Newton wrote volumes more on the Bible than he did on any science or physics, but most laypeople with a...
Well,..Pi does not " come out of the first verse in Genesis " { Aside from numerological wranglings that warrant no attention }
Rather the mathematical value for the first verse of the Bible is found in the digits of Pi { Base / radix 10 to be specific }
Now, being that the digits of Pi show...
Yup, this
Is the key to explaining this
Where should I start.....let's see.......ahhh, I know, let's start with with this man
Do you recognize this man ?
A.} The formula for the volume of a 4 sided pyramid
B.} The " seven seals " of the Book of Revelation
C.} Proof that ancient societies knew Pi to a degree of accuracy far above what academia acknowledges
D.} The answer to the mystery of the numbers 666 and 144,000
E.} The answer to the identity...
I'll tell you what, I'll do you one better
I'll start a thread on Mesopotamian languages and we can discuss the origin of the " Holy Spirit " in Mesopotamia
Except I won't use diacritical marks, so you'll have to actually use your knowledge of Mesopotamian languages to follow along
Feel up to...
Show me where Dawkins knows anything about Mesopotamian languages and I'd be impressed, otherwise he's a delusional fool suffering from the Dunning-Kruger effect
That goes for anybody taking his side
In hindsight, it is an interesting question, if anything for the reason that the character of Jesus replaced the " devil " { he-goat } scapegoat sin offering of the Levites, as in Greek, the concept was known as the " pharmakos "
" a person often already condemned to death sacrificed in ancient...
Dawkins is ignorant
I'd squash him in a debate on the Bible and I've never even read his books
He is a biologist arguing from logic
I doubt he knows anything about topics like, say for example, the semiosis of the graphemes found in the Aramaic alphabet, which would reveal how the Sofit form...