Extremely niave statement.
Yes & yes.
And I would also bet that if a census could be taken across the country of graduating 4yr students that actually read all of their textbooks cover to cover the outcome would be worse than the christians thatve read the bible front to back.
Its all...
I feel that a "belief" (youll get to understand that I dont like that word) in any supernatural being is obsurd to say the least.
That being said I think people should be able to "believe" (uggg) whatever they want, so long as it doesnt affect me.
:facepalm:
And a person just grows up to be a doctor, or a lawyer, or a car salesman.
One has to have an influence, the information, and mindest to do any of the above. Or become a "christian".
People dont just wake up one morning and say "Hey, I wanna be a christian" having never...
Three simple words...were, you, there.
Unless anyone can answer yes then its just like all of the rest of great literature from past times, subjective.
You can think it any way you want, but its all ******* in the wind.
No it is not wrong to be religious in public. I am not a religious person but my folks are extremely passionate. They pray in public and talk about christianty openly.
Nothing wrong with that as long as youre not pushing it on someone else. Of course thats one of the downsides to most...
Your title says simply, "2+2=5". Then you throw in "advanced" math.
:facepalm:
The statement 2+2=5 is absolutely :drool: (retarded). If I hold up two fingers from my left hand, and likewise on my right, why, Ive got 4 F'n fingers total.
This argument is a classic one for trying to...
I respectfully disagree.
A man might break in my car, and at the time my utmost desire might be to beat/kill that fellow. Doesnt mean Id do it. Saying that absolute desire is what man will ultimately choose takes away free will altogether. It also circumvents things like values or morals, much...
:facepalm:
Should we start putting signs up at Barnes & Noble that Shakespeare or Dawkins are off limits unless you have a Masters?
Perspective will still be there regardless of the education level.
As long as the human species can perceive color, "racism" will be around.
What we do with the knowledge that different people are different colors is on us. Some people are allowed to think freely while others are limited by demographic regions in which theyre born into.
However, people...
What constitutes racism in 2012 isnt wasnt it used to be. Overall as a society we're much more open with it IMO.
Today, youd have to be pretty direct and intent but itd get a reaction.
Like, "Hey! Those nappy ninjas look like theyre stealing the hubcaps off my ride!"