• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

Search results

  1. E

    Objective time (post redo)

    Here is 2 added sections to my post which would be right after #3 and before the conclusion: 4. An Example of Subjective Time Reversal Through changes in diet, we can appear younger. With skill, we can repair damaged objects, and through artistic endeavors like theater sets or paintings, we can...
  2. E

    Objective time (post redo)

    (This is a post redo of my "How to freeze time using logical reasoning" post, but instead of focusing on the freezing time aspect so much, I've instead gone in the direction of focusing on explaining objective time. I redid that post because many who commented on that post misunderstood the...
    • Echogem222
    • Thread
    • metaphysics philosophy of science time time dilation
    • Replies: 1
    • Forum: Philosophy
  3. E

    How to freeze time using logical reasoning

    Okay, I suppose that's fair, but the link I provided in my previous comment should connect you to a post explaining this with enough detail for you to get it, but I did edit my comment to give you that link, so maybe you just missed it. No, it isn't. - Δt′ is the time interval measured by the...
  4. E

    How to freeze time using logical reasoning

    You clearly don't understand the point I'm making if you think the time dilation equation is somehow able to counter my argument. My post must be understood from a philosophical perspective, not from a method of empirical evidence, it's through logical reasoning, which is something many, many...
  5. E

    How to freeze time using logical reasoning

    Here is another part of my post I would add to it if I could edit it (but now I can't): How Einstein's theory of time was correct: Einstein’s theory of time was correct only if he was explaining subjective time, which is why there’s a need to differentiate between two distinct types of time...
  6. E

    How to freeze time using logical reasoning

    Okay, fine. And yes, objective time is nothing from a certain perspective, your perspective, it would seem.
  7. E

    How to freeze time using logical reasoning

    Asking me what the worth in philosophy is, is a very long conversation I honestly don't feel like having.
  8. E

    How to freeze time using logical reasoning

    Correct, but it doesn't, so there is no issue. Einstein's theory of time applies only to subjective time, it does not apply to objective time, thus, no issues.
  9. E

    How to freeze time using logical reasoning

    This isn't science, it's philosophy, what part of that do you not understand? (i.e. the philosophy of science)
  10. E

    How to freeze time using logical reasoning

    I just added another section at the bottom for even more clarity, but I'll copy and paste it here: Added explanation for those who still don't get it: Imagine two people start at the same point in time, both with the same awareness or perception of time. Then, these two individuals go their...
  11. E

    How to freeze time using logical reasoning

    There, I just changed my original post to explain why Einstein was wrong about time.
  12. E

    How to freeze time using logical reasoning

    (Picture created by an AI [on the left side is objective time and on the right side is subjective time]) Einstein’s Theory of Time: Einstein’s theory of relativity fundamentally changed how we think about time. In his model, time is not absolute—it’s relative to the observer's motion or...
  13. E

    The Liar's Paradox Solution: Words as Mirrors of Understanding (Redo)

    Then you are not understanding my post correctly. Words reflect meaning, yes, but meaning still exists, just not "where" the words are. Words by themselves are just mirrors, but the direction they are facing is the meaning we use those mirrors to represent, so that we can communicate with...
  14. E

    The Liar's Paradox Solution: Words as Mirrors of Understanding (Redo)

    And?? This is not an argument against my post. It would seem that you also either didn't read my post or just skim read it.
  15. E

    The Liar's Paradox Solution: Words as Mirrors of Understanding (Redo)

    I have a feeling that you didn't read my whole post, or just skim read it. Am I correct? If I'm not correct, then please explain to me what words have no meaning (in other words, reflect no meaning), because you're being far too vague for me to understand what you're getting at.
  16. E

    The Liar's Paradox Solution: Words as Mirrors of Understanding (Redo)

    The first counter argument to the argument of my post being too unclear about words being mirrors summarizes things clearly enough (I believe). Here, I'll copy and paste it for you: A word itself doesn't have meaning, we just pick words to reflect meaning (hence a mirror). But where did that...
  17. E

    The Liar's Paradox Solution: Words as Mirrors of Understanding (Redo)

    (I understand this post may seem difficult to understand what I'm getting at, at first, but the "Possible counter arguments" section near the bottom, I believe explains enough [especially the first one]) Introduction: The Liar’s Paradox can be understood by the following statement “This...
  18. E

    Why we don't have free will using logic

    Just forget it, this conversation is clearly going nowhere at this point.
  19. E

    The hole paradox I came up with myself

    Did you not read what I responded with??? "That is what I'm saying, [[they could be saying that]], but I don't know that, therefore that does not equal them being correct as you are implying." This part [[they could be saying that]] means that yes, I could be possibly wrong, but I need to see...
  20. E

    The hole paradox I came up with myself

    That is what I'm saying, they could be saying that, but I don't know that, therefore that does not equal them being correct as you are implying. No, there are people in this thread and on other websites I've posted this on who do disagree with me about the observations I've made of holes.
Top