• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

science

  1. questfortruth

    Dark Matter solved

    Increasingly, we see phenomena that do not lead to the emergence of new experimentally confirmed theories or to the update of old theories acceptable to all scientists; an example is the (yet) futile search for Quantum Gravity and the Theory of Everything in an attempt to explain the...
  2. questfortruth

    Virtual Terms are "Hand of God"?

    Increasingly, we see phenomena that do not lead to the emergence of new experimentally confirmed theories or to the update of old theories acceptable to all scientists; an example is the (yet) futile search for Quantum Gravity and the Theory of Everything in an attempt to explain the...
  3. paarsurrey

    Can philosophy be proved by the scientific method

    Can philosophy be proved by the scientific method? I understand that all or many aspects of Philosophy cannot be proved / evidenced or demonstrated to be reliable by the Scientific Method. Right, please? Regards ___________ This thread is dedicated to friend @Israel Khan . #355 paarsurrey...
  4. questfortruth

    Let them bang Big Bang: missing antimatter paradox solved!

    Dr. Christian Smorra comments the "missing antimatter paradox" as "All of our observations find a complete symmetry between matter and antimatter, which is why the universe should not actually exist. An asymmetry must exist here somewhere but we simply do not understand where the difference is...
  5. questfortruth

    Science fights the Religion

    Proof: 1. Scientists follow the methodological naturalism, i.e. Science looks only for god-less explanation of nature and the effects. The probability of Darwinism is near zero, but because it is not believed to be exactly zero, the Darwinism is Scientific. 2. Thus, Science is called to...
  6. questfortruth

    Theology is Falsifiable, thus, - Scientific.

    One of the names of God is the God of gaps. Therefore, having eliminated the main gaps (for example, describing the Big Bang completely), the Scientists falsify Theology and All Religions. But this means that (according to the Popper Falsifiability Criterion) Theology and Religion is Science...
  7. questfortruth

    Major today's problem is today itself

    The paper Is gravity the force driving time forwards? | Cosmos adds to the Entropy growth the complexity growth. But did not explain, why today is 2020, but not 2021, or not 2019. You could think of the answer: "Because the earth rotates around the sun. And it's rotated around the sun 2020...
  8. questfortruth

    Does Einstein have problems with Scientific Scepticism?

    Everyone has an opinion. But can personal opinion be of use in Scientific Endeavour? In the best case scenario, which was perhaps during Albert Einstein's live times, the journals really read the articles of the authors trying to demonstrate them their fatal mistake. Then there could be a...
  9. C

    How old is man?

    According to "science" man is over 190,000 years old, but according to the Bible man is only about 6,000 years old. Now who is right? If science is right, why does the Bible only tell a story about 6,000 years old? What happened in the other 184,000 years? Were Adam and Eve really the first...
  10. A

    The Absolute Theory of Everything .

    I will gather my thoughts and return later when my children have settled for the evening to start to write the absolute theory of everything . I will write the entire theory here on this forum as opposed to writing a white paper . In writing this I will ''destroy'' many scientific falsities...
  11. danieldemol

    Why I like science

    Not sure if this belongs in a debate forum, but felt moved to mention. I like science because in a world with competing mythology science gives us an independent measuring rod to determine which mythologies (if any) are in accordance with reality. In short, I prefer to follow deductive...
  12. questfortruth

    Is there list of journal reputation?

    Quote: "Thank you for submitting to r/science! Submissions must pertain to recently published, peer-reviewed research in a reputable journal. In order to maintain productive discussions, we strictly enforce our submission and comment rules (see the sidebar)." Are modern open access journals...
  13. MrMrdevincamus

    Time is a myth, time is real, time is unreal, time is....

    The concept of time, or space Time* is after religious beliefs and questions about God are what I think about when spare time allows. It's so very obvious that Time* as explained to the masses by the scientific community and by Philosophers is either wrong or incomplete. As I said I believe some...
  14. paarsurrey

    Do “Quotes from scientists” belong to “Science and (or) Religion”?

    Do “Quotes from scientists” value as “Science and (or) Religion”,please? Or none of the two. Open for comments for everybody. Regards
  15. stvdv

    IMHO: Debate on "God exists (not)" is not sensible

    IMHO: Debate on "God exists (not)" is not sensible *) To say "God exists", means you know God 'fully' and have a proper definition of God *) He who makes a claim has to provide the evidence 1) Scientific person MUST provide evidence to claim "God exists not" 2) Spiritual person MUST provide...
  16. questfortruth

    Is there Dark Energy particle detector?

    And the second question: "Do they still try to detect Dark Matter particles? Why?" My opinion: They look for particles (matter) in gravitational Dark Matter anomaly because it puts in danger the founder of modern Science - sir Isaac Newton. Violating the Newton in his area of applicability...
  17. N

    Science Communication

    What do you guys think about the state of science communication today? In my opinion, I think that things are being oversimplified. The science communicators seem to not realize that we have something in our pockets capable of looking up the terms that they're using. A great example of someone...
  18. questfortruth

    Is tau-neutrino of zero-mass? Then it does not oscillate.

    My calculations show that tau-neutrino is massless. I see no reason to present in general public my complicated QM calculations because they will troll and bully my results. People are unjust trolls nowadays. So, to get the file, write to me: [email protected] They said, that Trump is the most...
  19. paarsurrey

    Are Skepticism “lonely defenders of science and reason”?

    Are Skepticism “lonely defenders of science and reason”? Or, are they “self-appointed vigilantes”? How does one visualize the above, please? Regards
  20. questfortruth

    Is science devil-oriented?

    QUOTE: Opponent: ``no evidence, here. No demonic testable evidence, and the Bible is not a biology textbook.'' Me: ``You have seen the negative sights, because you are using ``scientific skepticism". Latter is the fallacy of wishfull thinking. Try again, but now use the ``scientific trust"...
Top