• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

1 in 50 Democrats want Donald Trump executed

SkepticThinker

Veteran Member
Could you explain the 20 shell companies?
Say hypothetically, you were an honest Joe, and someone on your staff who cares about your political future, finds out about your son and your family's 20 shell companies. These companies produce nothing. This can make you look bad politically even if 100% innocent; by family association. Wouldn't you talk to your son, and have him stop or learn to approach his business, in a way, that better insulates you and is more legitimate with taxes?

As VP Joe Biden took Hunter of Air Force 2 to many places, that had Hunter Biden business partners. Even the Obama State Department was concerned about the optics. So even if Joe was honest, he should have known about his son's suspicious use of government resources and shell companies to avoid taxes from his overseas adventured.

But this behavior was left going, even after the IRS saw red flags. The real problem was a feeling of being above the law and untouchable. The fix was in for Hunter; let the statute of limitations run out. It was one honest judge that interrupted the fix. Many of the Biden henchman and hench women will need to testify with the circumstantial evidence a way to dig and compare facts to facts


Meanwhile ...

 

It Aint Necessarily So

Veteran Member
Premium Member
What I find interesting is that Giuliani apparently did not learn anything the first time around
The parallels between Trump and Giuliani in their defamation cases are amazing. Neither provided a defense and both received summary judgments followed by multimillion dollar awards, and then each repeated his defamation and got sued again. Both seem to be losing their minds, both have fallen from very high, both will end up broke and incarcerated for life, and both are disgraced.
I don't know the details but they have opened formal hearings on impeachment against Biden. That indicates they have some evidence of some kind against President Biden. It also presumes they will present a case in open.
They have no evidence against Biden of an impeachable offense, there is no reason to think he committed one, and will not make a case against Biden. How do I know? We've seen what they've offered to date. Joe loaned his brother $200,000 which was repaid and loaned his truck to his son in exchange for making the monthly payment through Joe. That's what law-abiding families do for one another.
innocent people do plead guilty
Three of those were attorneys. They all expected to lose at trial. Their co-defendants that don't taken a plea will be convicted in court. Willis has already announced that she will not accept plea offers from Trump, Giuliani, or Meadows in part because the cases against them are so strong without their cooperation.

Down goes Mark Meadows
That is a picture of boxes containing nothing President Trump didn't have authority to have.
He had them long after he was president, and he'll being going to prison for stealing, lying about, moving around, and sharing those documents.
when a key witness such as Hunter Biden defies a subpoena that portents political fireworks to come.
Hunter Biden humiliated the House Republicans, who have become a laughingstock over the way he played them.
You mean like the charges that were not pressed against Biden? No double standards there.
Biden didn't commit a crime. Trump did. Different actions are judged differently, but both under the same set of laws.
 
Last edited:
Top