• Welcome to Religious Forums, a friendly forum to discuss all religions in a friendly surrounding.

    Your voice is missing! You will need to register to get access to the following site features:
    • Reply to discussions and create your own threads.
    • Our modern chat room. No add-ons or extensions required, just login and start chatting!
    • Access to private conversations with other members.

    We hope to see you as a part of our community soon!

2070 Christs glorious return

Ben Avraham

Well-Known Member
Christ's Glorious Return.

"Christ'" is a term that comes from the Greek and it means the Anointed One of the Lord aka the Messiah. Now, the idea of a returning Messiah is a reference to the return of the Jews from exile. It has happened already for three times. The first time was from Egypt, whom they thought Moses was the Messiah and he turned out to be only a Messianic Leader who guided the Messiah back to the Promised Land. The second time around was from Babylon and, according Isaiah 45:1, the Messianic Leader turned out to be Cyrus who won the title for his role to proclaim freedom for the Jews and financing the rebuilding of the Temple. The third and last time has been now from the four corners of the earth and, the Messianic Leader, I consider to have been Theodor Herzl who sacrificed his life in the struggle to impregnate the Jews with love for Zion. The Third Jewish Commonwealth was proclaimed in 1948. Many Jews are still in the process of returning. And for this returning there was no need of the work of Jesus who, when he was born, the Land was under foreign occupation, during his lifetime, the occupation only grew bitter and biter. When he died, the Land was destroyed and the Jews forced out into another exile of almost 2000 years. The truth is that Jesus could never be classified even as a Messianic Leader, let alone the Messiah. I am sorry to have to rain so hardly on the parade of Christian faith but, the truth cannot be hidden.
 
Last edited:

Kemosloby

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
Christ's Glorious Return.

"Christ'" is a term that comes from the Greek and it means the Anointed One of the Lord aka the Messiah. Now, the idea of a returning Messiah is a reference to the return of the Jews from exile. It has happened already for three times. The first time was from Egypt, whom they thought Moses was the Messiah and he turned out to be only a Messianic Leader who guided the Messiah back to the Promised Land. The second time around was from Babylon and, according Isaiah 45:1, the Messianic Leader turned out to be Cyrus who won the title for his role to proclaim freedom for the Jews and financing the rebuilding of the Temple. The third and last time has been now from the four corners of the earth and, the Messianic Leader, I consider to have been Theodor Herzl who sacrificed his life in the struggle to impregnate the Jews with love for Zion. The Third Jewish Commonwealth was proclaimed in 1948. Many Jews are still in the process of returning. And for this returning there was no need of the work of Jesus who, when he was born, the Land was under foreign occupation, during his lifetime, the occupation only grew bitter and biter. When he died, the Land was destroyed and the Jews forced out into another exile of almost 2000 years. The truth is that Jesus could never be classified even as a Messianic Leader, let alone the Messiah. I am sorry to have to rain so hardly on the parade of Christian faith but, the truth cannot be hidden.
I thought you were a Christian now Ben. You said show me one prophecy Jesus fulfilled and you would turn Christian. Yet your viewpoint is soley from the view of the pots not the potmaker.
 

Ben Avraham

Well-Known Member
I thought you were a Christian now Ben. You said show me one prophecy Jesus fulfilled and you would turn Christian. Yet your viewpoint is soley from the view of the pots not the potmaker.

Well, are you going to provide me with a prophecy in the Tanach that points to Jesus and he fulfilled it? My proposal is still on! If you can't come out with some thing, I think that it will be fair enough that you reconsider your views and let me know of some change in your spiritual life if you have one.
 

Kemosloby

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
Well, are you going to provide me with a prophecy in the Tanach that points to Jesus and he fulfilled it? My proposal is still on! If you can't come out with some thing, I think that it will be fair enough that you reconsider your views and let me know of some change in your spiritual life if you have one.
The virgin prophecy where someone born of a virgin comes to be called "Mighty God" , I believe I'm already more spiritual than materialistic, dwelling more on spiritual matters than those of men, money and land.
 

Ben Avraham

Well-Known Member
Check the word used in the Isiah prophecy ...
no trace of virgin, just young woman ...

There are two kinds of virgins. One is the "Almah" a young woman still at the age of reproduction. The other is the "Betulah" aka a physical virgin who has never experienced sexual intercourse with a man.
 

Kemosloby

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
There are two kinds of virgins. One is the "Almah" a young woman still at the age of reproduction. The other is the "Betulah" aka a physical virgin who has never experienced sexual intercourse with a man.
Well only one of those fits the definitiion of a virgin, at least before Madonna was born.
 

Ben Avraham

Well-Known Member
There are two kinds of virgins. One is the "Almah" a young woman still at the age of reproduction. The other is the "Betulah" aka a physical virgin who has never experienced sexual intercourse with a man. True that the Isaiah prophecy does not mention "virgin" but a young woman, but the reference is to Israel, not even to a literal young woman. The reference pointed to Psalms 78:67-70 and it meant the last for Israel and the new beginning for Judah. That's when Israel was rejected and Judah confirmed for the sake of David as a People before the Lord forever. Hence, the woman giving birth to Immanuel was Israel and the child aka Immanuel was Judah if you read Isaiah 7:14,15,22 and 8:8.
 

Kemosloby

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
Oh no! That must mean that the entire 'Christian' religious idea is wrong!

It is a major point so I would not take their word for their word. The sense of it is that it was a virgin birth or the concept of it being a miraculous sign from God becomes nonsense.

Matt 1:23 All this took place to fulfill what the Lord had said through the prophet: 23“Behold! The virgin will be with child and will give birth to a son, and they will call Him Immanuel” (which means, “God with us”).
 

Desert Snake

Veteran Member

Ben Avraham

Well-Known Member
The virgin prophecy where someone born of a virgin comes to be called "Mighty God" , I believe I'm already more spiritual than materialistic, dwelling more on spiritual matters than those of men, money and land.

Okay! So, how long do I have to wait for a quote with Jesus being the target of a Messianic prophecy?
 

Kemosloby

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
and his name was ??
His name was Jesus. Where does the prophecy say his name would be Immanuel, it just says they will call him Immanuel meaning God with Us, and God with us could also be called Messiah, and they will call him Mighty God, Prince of Peace.
 

Ben Avraham

Well-Known Member
The virgin prophecy where someone born of a virgin comes to be called "Mighty God" , I believe I'm already more spiritual than materialistic, dwelling more on spiritual matters than those of men, money and land.

I already proved to you that the Gentiles of the Galilee called the Jews returning from exile in Babylon as Mighty God among other titles. It is in Isaiah 9:5 (JPS)
 

Kemosloby

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
I already proved to you that the Gentiles of the Galilee called the Jews returning from exile in Babylon as Mighty God among other titles. It is in Isaiah 9:5 (JPS)
No you didn't. That's absurd, they were at a low point having just been let out of captivity. The furthest thing from being called Mighty God by human wisdom.
 

Reggie Miller

Well-Known Member
The prophecy of Kemosloby. This is a theory that Christ will return to resurrect the dead in 2070 or shortly afterwards. Here is the basis of the theory and scriptural support.

Jesus stood in the temple of the Jews in Jerusalem and stated "tear down this temple and in 3 days I will raise it up again" This statement had multiple meanings. The temple Jesus was standing in was a Temple of God, Jesus' body was a temple of God; And those who believe in Jesus are the body of Christ. Christs body was destroyed on the cross and in 3 days resurrected. He was resurrected early on the third day, already gone before anyone came to look the next morning. The temple of the Jews was destroyed in 70 ad by the Romans. This started the timer for the resurrection. Christ promised to return to resurrect his church, i.e. those who believe in him. "But do not let this one fact escape you, The Lord is not slow at keeping his promise, he is patient not wanting any to perish but all to come to repentance, therefore let 1 day be 1000 years. 2 Peter 3:9; Some simple math says the third day is 2070-3070, and Christ said " I will come quickly like a thief in the night" So very shortly after 2070, paralleling the resurrection of Christ. Gone before morning.

Romans 6:5 For if we have been united with him in a death like his, we will certainly also be united with him in a resurrection like his.

Tobad you forgot about this one. I can only conclude that the prediction is 100% wrong:

"But about that day or hour no one knows, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father."

So you think you know when Jesus didn't even know when He was here on Earth. I suggest you and everyone else who believed this fallacy repent right now.
 

Kemosloby

Well-Known Member
Premium Member
Tobad you forgot about this one. I can only conclude that the prediction is 100% wrong:

"But about that day or hour no one knows, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father."

So you think you know when Jesus didn't even know when He was here on Earth. I suggest you and everyone else who believed this fallacy repent right now.

And that could still be true. Because we're talking about two kinds of days, an actual day and hour, and the pattern of the day and hour where day is 1000 years. So the theory narrows it down to 500 years our time. 2070 to 2570.
 
Top